**Hughes:** All right. Good evening, everyone. This is the regular meeting of the Downers Grove School District 58 Board of Education, here on Monday, February the 9th, 2026, at 7 p.m. here at the Downers Grove Civic Center. This meeting is being live-streamed for the public on the Village of Downers Grove's YouTube channel. Melissa, will you please call roll?
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Bernard.
**Bernard:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Doshi.
**Doshi:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Ellis is absent. Member Hanus.
**Hanus:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Olczyk.
**Olczyk:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Thomas.
**Thomas:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Hughes.
**Hughes:** Here.
Just as a quick note for everyone, later on in the agenda, we had a spotlight on our education foundation that has actually been postponed until April because the presenter is out sick today. So if anybody was here for that, just wanted to give you a heads up.
Another quick announcement: tonight, members of the audience will have an opportunity to provide public comment later on in the agenda. The board asks anyone wishing to comment to please fill out a card — they're over there by the main door. Fill out that card, indicate the topic to be addressed, and then place it in that basket. I have allotted 30 minutes tonight for public comment.
All right, we're going to go ahead and start as we always do with the Pledge of Allegiance. I'd like to welcome up the student council members from Henry Puffer School to lead us.
**Student:** I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
**Hughes:** Thank you so much. Now I'd like to welcome up the principal of Henry Puffer School, Principal Leapart.
**Principal Leapart:** Good evening, everyone. It's an honor for Henry Puffer to shine a spotlight on all the wonderful things going on in our school today. We are going to have some of our student council reps talk to you, as well as our PTA presidents, and then I'll share a few of our spotlights and some of the data that we've been working through this year. First up is Brooke Vogt.
**Student (Medina Abbas):** Good evening. My name is Medina Abbas. I'm one of the fifth grade student council representatives. This year, the student council board has several goals to make sure that we all have a fun and successful year. Our main goal was to take as many opinions from the student body as possible and not just come up with these ideas ourselves.
One of the most important goals was to spread kindness throughout the school. We did this through a kindness-themed spirit week and a kindness club. Everyone is working hard to spread kindness throughout the school and all the grades. Our most powerful goal was to have a fundraiser for many different organizations. One of the organizations that we helped was the FISH Food Pantry in Downers Grove. We did this to help families in Downers Grove and nearby areas with food and supplies.
Last but not least, our final goal was to have better communication with PTA members. We were able to build a relationship with PTA members by asking our student council teacher sponsors to communicate to the PTA for student council, as we donated to their event which helped many Puffer families. Next, you will hear from my fellow council member Brooke Vogt, who will discuss our exciting spirit week themes at Henry Puffer.
**Student (Brooke Vogt):** Hi. This year, student council has done many fun spirit days at our school. Some examples of these spirit days are Red Ribbon Week, Holiday Spirit Week, and PJ Day. These spirit days help students show school spirit and have fun together. Some spirit days are also fundraisers that help support school activities. We ask students to participate and enjoy dressing up with their classmates. Spirit days are a win-win because students have fun and help the school at the same time. With student council this year, we hope to make school more exciting and create even more fun spirit days.
**Student (Carson Sandage):** Hi. My name is Carson Sandage. I'm on Henry Puffer Student Council. We have done a number of fundraisers so far this year. In December, we held a food drive for FISH Food Pantry. If you donated food, you could get raffle tickets to try to win a giant bear. In total, we collected and donated 835 pounds of food to help people in our community. We also set up a school shop to raise money and build school spirit. The Henry Puffer Student Council is excited to support our school community and the Downers Grove community.
**Student (Elena Collive):** Hi, my name is Elena Collive, and I am one of the fifth grade student council representatives. Henry Puffer loves to help. We help by spreading kindness, handing out blue tickets, hosting school spirit days, and running our school store.
Henry Puffer uses a system of blue tickets. Every time a kid makes a good choice — like finishing their homework or helping a peer — a teacher might spot them and give them a blue ticket. Then at school assemblies, our principal, Mr. Leapart, picks one from all the collected tickets, and whoever that ticket belongs to gets a prize. This is our way of encouraging good choices.
We have also set up our school store. Every other Wednesday, our representatives go to each grade level and kids can buy pencils, erasers, or pens. Fun school supplies make learning even more fun. And these are just some of the ways our student council helps Henry Puffer.
Next up are our PTA presidents, Jackie Olitz and Carrie McTagart.
**PTA President (Jackie Olitz):** Hi, thank you for having us. That is a really tough act to follow — very impressive work by our student council. My name is Jackie Olitz.
**PTA President (Carrie McTagart):** I'm Carrie McTagart. We are in our second year as PTA co-presidents at Henry Puffer with the Puffer Hefty PTA.
I want to highlight the rest of our board for a couple of reasons. One, we have a treasurer, Dan Hint, who's now in his unprecedented second term. I don't know if anybody knows, but it's not often you see somebody raise their hand to go another two years, so a shoutout to Dan. We're also really impressed with our PTA in the sense that our dads are very active in our PTA and with all of our events, so we want to make sure we gave a spotlight to that. Emily Middle serves as our vice president and is in her first year, and Sheila Brigette serves as our secretary and is also in her second year.
So with that, we're going to talk a little bit about the ways that we connect and support our Puffer community. First, this year we did our second Halloween Bingo, but this year our chairs took it to another level and made it a zero-waste event — there was absolutely no waste generated by this event held on site at the school, which was really extraordinary. It was a great opportunity to show the kids that we can continue to do fun things without generating a lot of waste. We also do a long run to honor Gene Pogue, but this year we added color to the run, which was really exciting for the kids. They had a choice at the end of the run whether they wanted to run through the color stations, in case that was overstimulating for them — an exciting new addition.
And then this year, Carrie orchestrated a poinsettia fundraiser, which was new and fun. It was a really nice way at our waffle breakfast for families to pick up their poinsettias and have those as gifts for their families as well.
We continue to do a monthly newsletter. This was new. One of the things that PTAs really struggle with is the fact that all different generations want to communicate differently — there's email, there's ParentSquare, there's Facebook pages. We are in our second year of offering a monthly newsletter for our families, in addition to Mr. Leapart's Puffer Post, so that we can continue to communicate all the things that are happening for our staff, students, and teachers.
And then kinder and new family outreach — this is one of the things that Carrie and I are really proud of. Every year we call every single new kindergarten family to try and touch base with them and welcome them into Puffer. We also do that for all new families regardless of grade coming into our school. We want them to know who we are, know who the PTA is, and feel like they have someone they can reach out to if they have questions, versus feeling like contacting the school is scary. Things like: what does the ice cream social look like, and what is the dungeon — if anybody doesn't know what that is at Puffer.
**Carrie McTagart:** Supporting our school and staff — these are just a list of things that the PTA brings to bear within Henry Puffer. A couple of things I do want to highlight that are sort of in addition to what you would probably hear from most parent-teacher organizations.
We do a staff holiday gift drive. We want to make sure that not just our teachers — who feel the love from their students every holiday season — but also any staff member and/or teacher that doesn't have their own classroom has a holiday gift from the PTA as well.
Enrichment requests: we take our largest fundraiser of the year and figure out how much overflow we have after covering all of our events and items, and then we give it back to the teachers as an opportunity to ask for enrichments for their classroom or things that serve the school as a whole — things like wobble stools in different classrooms, if that's something a teacher has extra need for. The PTA does what we can to make sure we can provide that at the end of each school year.
The other thing that is new this year — usually students can order school supply boxes, and the PTA usually provides a box for each of the teachers as well for extra supplies. What we've realized is there are like 25 pink erasers that the teachers don't need anymore. So we are doing something new this year: in January, we collected requests for what items teachers are actually missing.
**Jackie Olitz:** Mostly Kleenex.
**Carrie McTagart:** Mostly Kleenex and Expo markers. And then the money that we would have spent on the pre-packed boxes, we're using that to actually buy the supplies that teachers need to help in the classroom for the second half of the year. First year we're doing this — I think it's going to be perfect. We're really excited.
Again, another long list of things that we do just to support our students across the school. One of the things I'll say about our PTA and our parent and caregiver community as a whole: we do everything in our power to be able to say yes to every request that comes from our school. We know that we have varying degrees of resources, exposure, and access across our community, and so the PTA takes it very much to heart to make the experience as equitable as possible for all of the students that come into Puffer.
The class t-shirts are fun — Carrie made a huge effort to bring those back. The PTA supports each class having their own color and every student having a t-shirt. These are great for our teachers on field trips because they can spot their students, and they've also been a really fun way for each class to represent themselves during school assemblies. It's kind of a rainbow of colors across the gym, which is really fun.
This is again just a list of things showcasing a lot of the fun that we have and more ways that we're supporting our families and community. I talked a little bit about Halloween Bingo and it being zero-waste. The other thing I would highlight: we do a holiday breakfast every year — it's usually a pancakes-and-pajamas type of deal. This year, our extraordinary parents took on making waffles, which we thought was crazy, but they did it without a hitch and it was awesome and people loved it.
Both of those events are self-funded, and we are able to take all of the overage from ticket sales and donations and give that money back to community members. For folks that need a little additional support, we purchase gift cards with that overage and those are given out over the holiday season to families in our community.
**Jackie Olitz:** Anything else?
**Carrie McTagart:** That's the biggest one.
**Jackie Olitz:** Okay, that's it.
So just to talk a little bit about our Panther Pride — if you weren't getting that from us yet, then we haven't done our job.
**Carrie McTagart:** Oh, this is you.
**Jackie Olitz:** Oh — I edited this, so I apologize.
**Carrie McTagart:** I think I know where to start. I'll steal your thunder. Thank you for having us. We appreciate it.
**Jackie Olitz:** Just for context, the dungeon is not where we send misbehaving students — it's storage in the basement.
**Principal Leapart:** At Henry Puffer, our work truly starts and ends with people — our students, teachers, families, and community. Our Henry Puffer families come together once a month, providing students with meaningful opportunities to build relationships with Puffer Panthers across all grade levels. Students remain in the same Puffer family with the same staff member from the time they join us in kindergarten until the time they leave us in fifth or sixth grade, fostering strong connections and a deep sense of belonging.
Our school environment is rooted in being respectful, responsible, and safe, and we intentionally cultivate a positive school culture grounded in the tenets of the Happiness Advantage. Our strong partnership with families is reflected in our collaboration with our amazing PTA and in initiatives such as Watchdogs and Puffer Reunions.
We're excited to welcome our Watchdogs fathers and father figures each Wednesday as they spend half the day supporting classrooms and making lasting memories with their children. We also host reunions for former Puffer students who return to visit their old stomping grounds — we even had someone come from as far as Hawaii this year.
This year we were thrilled to partner with Lyman Woods to create the Henry Puffer Garden on the southwest corner of our building, connecting with our already-established Hannah's Garden. This special project included Mr. Maywin, one of our Puffer parents and a Lyman Woods member, who taught students about native plants and worked alongside students and parent volunteers to bring the garden to life. We're hoping this will be an outdoor space our school and community will enjoy for years to come.
Students also thrive through a wide variety of clubs and activities, including running club, podcasting club, photography, kindness club, student council, and our fifth and sixth grade buddies. Together, these opportunities create a vibrant, inclusive environment where students feel connected, supported, and empowered to grow.
Our guiding beliefs center on the idea that all students can learn and thrive when our work is intentional, focused, and aligned. We use a funnel approach in which district goals inform our building priorities, those priorities guide our classroom practice, and instruction ultimately impacts each individual student. This alignment ensures coherence and clarity across all levels of work.
We believe that what we look for is what we find, which reinforces the importance of directing our energy toward strengths, effective practices, and factors within our control. When we intentionally seek out positives, we're better positioned to build upon them, just as overemphasis on negatives can limit growth.
Data plays a critical role in informing instruction and guiding decision-making, allowing us to adjust practices in ways that enhance student learning through cycles of inquiry. We focus our collective efforts on instructional strategies that yield the greatest impact, supporting continuous improvement in literacy, math, and school culture and climate.
Our first goal addresses an identified area of need based on the ECRA and NWEA MAP data and supports overall literacy development while aligning with the Illinois Comprehensive Literacy Plan. Teachers use student work, assessment data, and teacher estimates of instruction from John Hattie to plan targeted instruction aligned to Benchmark Advance, with an emphasis on intentional small-group instruction. Resources such as Scholastic News and Scope are incorporated across grade levels to provide regular practice with informational texts. Progress is monitored through assessment reviews, PLC+ data discussions, and instructional planning, with effectiveness measured using our ECRA propensity model, MAP results, and ongoing feedback from our instructional coaches.
Our second goal focuses on developing deep mathematical thinking, reasoning, and transferable skills through the intentional use of backwards design and deliberate practice. Teachers have integrated problem-solving opportunities into daily instruction, utilizing Forefront MAP and ECRA data to monitor progress and adjust lessons, and collaborate with grade-level teams to ensure alignment with all standards. Our instructional coaches have supported planning, data analysis, and modeling of effective strategies. Progress is monitored through student growth in the ECRA and MAP assessments as well as benchmark testing, Forefront reporting, and team data discussions, with ongoing accountability provided through unit meetings, team planning, and coaching feedback.
Our third goal has focused on strengthening trust and instructional leadership to support a positive school culture. Efforts have included structured ILT collaboration to build collective teacher efficacy, staff and committee meetings that provide opportunities for feedback and shared decision-making, and professional learning sessions that incorporate teacher input into instructional planning. Classroom rotations during our staff meetings have highlighted teacher-led strategies, successes, and innovations. Progress has been monitored through ongoing check-in surveys, ensuring continuous growth in school culture and climate.
Our winter MAP results show some pretty strong progress for our students. In math, students achieved in the 82nd percentile nationally in the winter — that's an increase up from the 65th percentile in the fall. In reading, our students scored in the 78th percentile nationally, up from the 64th percentile in the fall. Student growth was also quite impressive, with math growth in the 84th percentile nationally and reading growth in the 74th percentile.
Our winter ECRA data provides another snapshot of our student performance and shows meaningful improvement from where we began in the fall. ECRA offers a different perspective than MAP, as its calculations are based on where students finished in the previous spring and do not include students in grades 1 through 6 who were new to us this year. Overall, 74% of our students met benchmark, representing a 6% increase from fall, and 86% demonstrated high or expected growth, an increase of 9%. The overall growth effect size improved to -0.01, which was a 0.13 gain from the fall — pretty significant.
In math, 70% of our students met their benchmark, which was up 7%, with 85% of our students showing high or expected growth — an increase of 13% — and the growth effect size improving to -0.05, which is a gain of 0.37.
In reading, 79% of our students met benchmark, which was an increase of 6%, and 89% demonstrated high or expected growth, which is up 4%, with a growth effect size of +0.03, which is slightly lower than it was in the fall.
As far as grade levels are concerned, our winter growth data for Henry Puffer shows generally strong performance across grade-level cohorts with clear areas for some targeted support in math. Kindergarten, second, third, and fourth grade cohorts demonstrated positive growth effect sizes, with our third grade cohort showing particularly strong growth. The kindergarten and first grade cohorts had high percentages of students meeting benchmark, though first grade growth was notably lower — likely influenced by this cohort having finished last year in the 99th percentile.
In the upper grade-level cohorts, fifth and sixth grades had fewer students meeting benchmark, but most demonstrated expected growth, highlighting steady progress alongside opportunities for closing achievement gaps.
In reading, the kindergarten, second, third, and fifth grade cohorts posted positive growth effect sizes. The first and fourth grade cohorts had solid benchmark attainment but slightly negative growth, indicating progress closer to expected levels rather than accelerated. The sixth grade cohort demonstrated expected growth for most students, though the growth effect size was slightly negative, suggesting a need for some targeted support to strengthen progress. Overall, the data shows strong foundational performance across the school with opportunities to improve and accelerate learning, particularly in first, fourth, fifth, and sixth grade cohorts.
One area that we continue to closely monitor is the growth of our subgroups. Winter growth data for Henry Puffer shows that all student subgroups achieved growth within the expected range, with some groups demonstrating particularly strong progress. In math, our English learners, Asian students, and other student groups showed positive growth effect sizes, while Black, Hispanic, IEP, and low-income students had slightly lower growth but still within the expected range. Gender differences were minimal, with male students showing slightly higher growth than females.
In reading, our ELs, Asian, and other student groups posted positive growth, while Black, Hispanic, IEP, and low-income students had slightly negative growth effect sizes — again, all within the expected range. Overall, subgroup data highlights steady progress across our school while identifying opportunities to accelerate learning for specific groups to further close those achievement gaps.
One of the metrics our team tracks is the percentage of students performing in the average quintile and above on MAP over time. This provides a snapshot of student achievement growth over the past three and a half years. We typically see the largest gains from fall to winter with slight regression from winter to spring, and more pronounced regression from spring to fall, reflecting both summer slide and the impact of our more transient student population. Despite this, the overall trend line in both math and reading remains positive.
Currently, 92.5% of our students are performing in the average quintile and above in math, and about 88% are in the average quintile and above in reading — an increase of 7% in math and 4.5% in reading from last winter.
I won't continue on with any more numbers, but I do thank you for the time and the opportunity to shine a spotlight on Henry Puffer School.
**Hughes:** Thank you so much. For all our student council members, we do have some gifts for you. Thank you for being here tonight.
All right. Listed on tonight's agenda are 20 communications received by the board. Are there any additional communications a board member would like to share at this time?
That brings us to our next item. We're going to start off tonight with our 10-year health life safety review with Kevin Bart.
**Presenter (Nishi Sha, Whiten Company):** Hello. I'm Nishi Sha with Whiten Company. I'm an architect and project manager. I've been working on all of your referendum projects for the schools.
Every 10 years, the Illinois State Board of Education requires the district to have a licensed architectural professional walk all of your buildings to make sure they're in compliance with applicable building codes. Each building is on a 10-year cycle. The majority of your buildings —
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah, Whiten Company]**
Hello. I'm Nishi Shah with Whiten Company. I'm an architect and project manager. I've been working on all of your referendum projects for the schools.
Every 10 years, the Illinois State Board of Education requires the district to have a licensed architectural professional walk all your buildings to make sure they're in compliance with applicable building codes. Each building is on a 10-year cycle. The majority of your buildings are on 10-year cycles from 2015 to 2025, with the exception of Henry Puffer, as you acquired that separately. That one is on a 2023 cycle, so Henry Puffer was done two years ago and we completed that at that time.
We currently have the remaining schools that we need to complete for the 10-year life safety review. Because we have all the construction projects from the referendum, we have scheduled these to happen after all those projects are done, so you're having minimal violation items. At this round we are looking at nine buildings: your two middle schools, which were completed this December, and seven elementary schools from the phase one and phase two work — Hillcrest, Highland, Whittier, Fairmount, Kingsley, Lester, and —
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Indian Trail.
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
Indian Trail. Thank you. I was like —
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
That was still pretty impressive.
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
The remaining schools — the three elementary schools — we will be looking at in the fall of this year after their summer projects are completed. So Baer, Elsie, and Pierce Town will be looked at after those are completed.
We're required to complete four documents. The first is existing building conditions. We have to write narratives about what your building systems are now and what codes apply. We have to provide updated floor plans showing life safety data — meaning the rating of the walls, the mechanical system, and where your smoke detectors are. The main part of it is that we have to document violations. We walk your buildings, check them against the code in effect when they were built, and verify that everything is in compliance.
We walked the buildings for these first nine after construction was done — either in the fall of this year or this past January — and we had the preliminary findings, which we walked through with Kevin Bartau and Greg Harris a week or so ago.
In terms of process and methodology: we have done a lot of your projects already, so we have a really good picture of your buildings. They are in really good shape with a minimal number of violations. There are three different categories for violations.
The first is **urgent** — an immediate hazard to life or safety of the students. These must be addressed within one year. ISBE tells you that you need to address these items within a year. This can be something structural, something related to exiting, or fire detection — making sure all your smoke detectors are working — so that in the event of some type of incident, students can exit safely.
The second is **required** — these must be addressed within five years. Examples include electrical outlets near water that need GFCI protection.
The third is **recommended**, which is within 10 years. These are not required, but you can add them. They are typically accessibility items — sidewalks, playgrounds — things that may have a tripping hazard or similar condition.
Generally, your buildings are in really good shape. The middle schools, because they had comprehensive updates during the referendum projects, have no violations — we really touched every part of those buildings and everything is in compliance. Your remaining elementary schools had some minimal items.
We have about $50,000 in urgent items. These might be a penetration in a wall that needs to be sealed or a door that needs to swing a different direction. Most of these were in areas that we did not touch during the referendum projects. In addition to that, you have about $23,000 in five-year required items. This might be outlets in classrooms that are near sinks — you have a lot of sinks in your elementary school classrooms, and there are probably outlets that have been there for 50 years that need to be updated with proper safety protection.
The recommended category contains the majority of items. These are not required, but include things like Whittier paving — we know there are a lot of bumps in that asphalt — or areas where you might have certain glass that, if broken, would need to be replaced. Those are all 10-year recommended items.
So to summarize: these seven elementary schools have the items I described. The two middle schools had no violations. We will be completing the remainder in the fall. I'll see you here about a year from now.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Questions or comments? We were going to ask the same question.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
I'm assuming yes, but I wanted to ask — did we review those urgent and required items and identify any that were in the scope of enhancements over the past two to three years of projects where we would have expected our contractors to be accountable?
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
When we walked those buildings, we did ask whether each item was something that was part of the referendum and should have been taken care of versus whether it was a separate item. So we did discern those items.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
So everything on this list is not within that bucket, and those items were handled by the contractors?
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
Correct.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
I was going to ask if we can get the list.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Yes, I believe that was on the agenda.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
I think it was on the agenda earlier, but now all we see is the presentation. The individual reports were there this morning.
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
They were — let me check. Right now they are drafts. We'll have to upload them to ISBE once you approve, and it is a draft version currently.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Is it — click the link?
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Is it the survey?
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
This should be the violations.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
It's done by individual school, then.
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
Yes, it is.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
If you click the link that says "survey."
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Okay, sorry — I didn't know what the main files were. Yeah, it looks like the top has it.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Nice. And then it takes you to the drive, and they're all in there.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
I see. Thank you.
**[Dr. Russell / Staff]**
And if any board member wants more specifics on anything you see in the list, Kevin Bartau and Nishi can get that to you in an update.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Any other comments or questions? We appreciate your time. Thank you very much.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Thank you, Nishi.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
All right. As I said earlier, we're going to be skipping the Education Foundation presentation tonight — that has been moved to April. That brings us to the reports of the board. We'll start with the superintendent report. Dr. Russell.
---
**[Dr. Russell — Superintendent Report]**
Thank you. For my report tonight, I'll start with personnel. Tonight's personnel report is more of a preview. At our March meeting, there will be two topics discussed. First, Justin will share a high-level preview of staffing planning for next school year and an update on where we are in that process. Additionally, we will discuss the 2027–28 calendar, with the hope of approving that calendar at the April meeting. We're looking forward to more complete alignment with District 99's calendar because construction will no longer impact our start and end dates. As a reminder, the 2026–27 calendar has already been approved and is up on our website for anyone to view.
In terms of curriculum and instruction, this past weekend the band and orchestra solo fest was held and it was a huge success. More than 495 solos and ensembles were performed at this event — I had to do a double take when I read that number. We have a very robust performing arts program here in our district and they did a great job. We want to thank our instrumental music department for all their hard work planning and preparing, and thank our parent volunteers who helped keep the day running. As you can imagine, when you have almost 500 students performing, it requires a lot of volunteers and we are really grateful for everyone. It was a wonderful event.
Speaking of wonderful events, we're looking forward to the District 58 Festival of Music, which will take place next week on February 19th at Downers Grove South. We alternate between the two high school venues. This is always a fun event when O'Brien and Herrick combine their bands, orchestras, and choirs, so you don't want to miss that one if you're available that evening.
On February 23rd, we will also hold our curriculum workshop here. At the workshop, we'll share the winter data snapshot as well as updates on the middle school MAP pilot and the work of many of our district committees. We'll also have a discussion about athletics and activities for next school year at the middle schools.
Finance will be covered by Dr. Harris in his CSBO report, so we'll skip that here.
For technology: this past Friday, District 58 sent benchmark assessment reports home via ParentSquare using its secure document delivery system. Sending reports home digitally is more secure, efficient, and cost-effective than printing reports for all students. For security reasons, these reports are not sent as attachments — instead, parents are required to sign into their ParentSquare account to view them. The nice thing about that is that once you do, they are always there and accessible. We appreciate that feature in ParentSquare, and it is one of the new advantages of our new system.
For special services: District 58 looks forward to offering extended school year programming to eligible students with disabilities. Students who qualify for ESY through their IEP will receive a direct invitation and more information from their child's case manager. Dates for the program will be June 12th through July 14th. That sounds like a long way away, but it will come very quickly — as today's hundredth day of school, which our kindergarten teachers demonstrated, reminds us. It is a little later this year because of our late start, but we are getting closer and closer to the end of the school year.
For public relations: just a reminder about our legislative breakfast, which was postponed due to the extreme cold day. District 58 will host its annual legislative breakfast — really more of a forum than a formal breakfast — on Friday, February 20th at 7 a.m. at Herrick Middle School. Several state legislators are expected to attend. The event provides an opportunity to engage in discussion around key issues impacting District 58 and the broader school community. I want to thank our legislative committee for their hard work organizing this forum every year. It's always a good event and it's nice to speak with our legislators.
We have also sent out both of our annual surveys — the District 58 climate survey and the Five Essentials survey. We encourage families to take both. The Five Essentials survey is also available to all staff, and students in grades four through eight will take it as well. So those are coming up. That concludes my report.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Fantastic. Any questions or comments on the superintendent report? All right. That brings us to our monthly business and treasurer's report. Dr. Harris.
---
**[Dr. Harris — CSBO Report]**
Good evening, members of the board. Tonight I will be speaking on just two topics. The first is the year-to-date report and the treasurer's report, which is included in your packet.
I'd like to offer a little analysis on the year-to-date report. On the revenue side, some things drawing my attention: I think we're running a bit low on our state special education funding. We think we're going to be off there a little bit — that has to do with proration hitting us a bit more deeply than we anticipated. But there are bright spots as well. One is interest revenue, and some of the big ones we count on — EAV, property taxes — are all running really well. Our local revenue in the other column is also a bright spot.
So there are some places where we're off to the negative and some where we're off to the good, and it kind of balances out. On the expenditure side, I'm looking very closely at salaries and benefits since those are our biggest costs. I think we're a little bit under on salaries and a little bit over on benefits, especially in the educational fund. But since the salaries number is much larger than the benefits number, I'd much rather be favorably off on salaries than unfavorably off. I'm pleased with that and I don't think there's anything to be concerned about.
I'll pause and see if any board members have any questions on the monthly reports.
**[No questions.]**
The other item is just an FYI for the board of education and the community. Very soon the district will be putting out our request for proposals for our food service program. We are acknowledging that the board has a new vision for what that program should look like — specifically, hot meals for all students, K through 8. Previously that had only been available at the middle schools. We currently have two vendors handling our middle school program and our elementary program separately. We are going to be looking for one vendor to handle everything. Since the scope of the project has changed, we are going out for an RFP.
You will also see in tonight's construction consent agenda the realization of this vision from the board of education, as we are purchasing a lot of equipment for our kitchens thanks to a grant provided by Representative Anstafa. This is just an FYI — there's no news yet, just that we are in the process of moving forward. We expect to bring a recommendation to the board at the May or June meeting at the latest. Any questions?
**[No questions.]**
---
**[Dr. Russell]**
We are very excited to receive this kitchen grant from Representative Saba. Like our playgrounds, this is a huge help. We had always planned to use the interest money from the referendum for kitchen equipment — that was something we discussed after the referendum — but this grant really does help us and almost erases the entire cost of putting the kitchen equipment in.
As a reminder for the board, last summer we were able to complete the kitchen work for the phase two schools. This summer we'll be doing the kitchen work at the phase one and phase three elementary schools. Some schools are a bit easier to work with — Henry Puffer is a good example because they used to have a food service program when it was its own district. Other schools are more challenging. When you think about a school like Highland or Lester, the kitchen area is that small room off the gym, and there are building code requirements that we have to squeeze in there. I want to thank our architects for getting very creative with that.
This is something we have been hearing about for a long time. I know the board has heard about it, and I've certainly heard about it since I've been superintendent here. We are one of the only remaining districts in the area that does not offer a food service program for our elementary students. With so many of our families having two working parents, this is a really good thing for our families. It's also a really nice thing for any student who qualifies for free and reduced lunch, so that they're able to get a consistent meal day in and day out at our schools.
We're very happy to move this forward. Next year will certainly be a learning year — when you haven't done something in over 100 years and then implement it, I'm sure there will be some bumps in the road. But with the new middle school kitchens, we're very excited about the plan and the rollout.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Fantastic. Questions or comments? Appreciate it. Thank you. All right, onto our committees.
The policy committee has not met since the last board meeting. Neither has the legislative committee. The financial advisory committee has met. You heard a little about that in the report — we went over the year-to-date report, things in general were looking good, and we talked about the food service RFP.
The only thing I'd add is that, as Dr. Russell was alluding to, we have very small kitchens in our grade schools. So it will be a hub-and-spoke model. The dividing line will be the train tracks — each middle school will be the starting point for food preparation, and the elementary schools will have more of a warmer-and-finisher setup.
A big part of that bid is also going to keep the grade schools, at least in the opening bid, on a pre-order model. Students pre-order for the week from a menu. That helps us keep down food waste and makes sure kids actually get the meal they were looking for rather than something running out in the process.
The RFP is included in tonight's packet. This is the first phase, which will go out to bid, and we're looking forward to getting one vendor to handle this whole piece. If you remember, Quest at the time could not deliver to the grade schools at a price that made sense. They were willing to hold back, and they even shared their ordering system to help us bridge this gap. Now we can't make a major change without going back out to RFP, so this is required for us even apart from the timing. We had done a one-year contract and then extended it with Quest.
The other big topic we discussed was policies. There are really two significant policies that previously came out of the financial advisory committee: our fund balance policy and our capital policy.
Now that we're coming out of a referendum, we're looking at making some adjustments and tying those policies to our long-term needs — specifically looking out five years and making sure we're funding things appropriately. We're looking at starting off at about $750,000 in capital reserves. We've been reviewing the language around that, making sure we're within the boundaries of what is required by law and what we're actually going to need. As you may know, our DSAB bonding ability is going to need to be used for other purposes, so we need to make sure we have the ability to maintain things. A good frame of reference — and one of the reasons why $750,000 stands out — is that it's about half a roof per year in savings. Roofs are one of our more expensive recurring needs.
The other policy is our fund balance policy. We're looking at reframing that as we've dialed everything into a purely cash basis rather than toggling back and forth between accrual and cash. Part of it is: what can we cover now, and what do we need to cover? Right now we still have our arbitrage dollars, so we're in a position where we need to set ourselves up to reach that minimum number in a year or two. What should that exactly look like, and how should we define it? We're looking at a blend — the overall percentage to expenses as well as the number of days cash on hand — because of the way we get funded at the beginning and end of our fiscal year. If we can show on a graph where our low cash points fall, it's easy to see whether we're capable of covering our expenses throughout the year.
We're going to be getting some language together over the next couple of meetings and will bring it forward before the end of the school year. We think the new language will not only cover what we need to do but set us up to be successful.
Steve, did I miss anything?
**[Dr. Harris]**
No, you got it covered.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Questions or comments from the board? Okay.
The district leadership team has not met, and neither has health and wellness. We do have a SASID report. Dr. Russell.
---
**[Dr. Russell — SASID Report]**
The biggest thing we're working on with SASID right now centers on SASID's facilities. Short-term, we're figuring out all the leases for classroom spaces. As you know, District 58 will house more SASID classrooms, and we're going over all of those with the executive director — not only here in District 58 but for all member districts in SASID.
Long-term, SASID's facility and finance committees are working on some options for the co-op, particularly regarding their district office and transition program. The current space on Ogden Avenue in Lisle is not really conducive to either the transition program or the office in general. They are looking at different options for purchasing a building that can house their administrative center as well as the transition program.
One of the things I love to hear as a superintendent — and I'm sure the board will too — is that we are only looking at cost-neutral options, meaning that member districts will not have to incur any debt as a result of what SASID is trying to do in terms of the long-term facility plan. We're looking at spreading the debt out over several years, as we do in local school districts, so that SASID can be the one to issue any debt certificates and local districts would not have to absorb that. More to come on that, but we are getting closer. I do serve on the finance committee for SASID, so I'm paying particularly close attention to how this might impact member districts while still ensuring that we have a great facility for not only our transition program but for the administrative offices as well.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Questions or comments? I just want to say that the overall cost has been a concern of ours — obviously we're dealing with some financial challenges in general — so I'm glad to hear that —
**Dr. Russell (or Mr. Sisle):** Another thing to note here is that we are only looking at cost-neutral options, meaning that member districts will not have to incur any debt as a result of what SASID is trying to do in terms of the long-term facility plan. We're looking at spreading the debt out over several years, like we do in local school districts, to make sure that SASID can be the one who issues any debt certificates and the local districts would not have to absorb that. So, more to come on that, but we are getting closer. I do serve on the finance committee for SASID, so I'm paying particularly close attention to how that might impact member districts while still ensuring that we have a great facility for not only our transition program, but for the administrative offices as well.
**Board Member:** Questions or comments? I just want to say that I think that has been a concern of ours — the overall cost. Obviously, we're dealing with some financial challenges here in general, so I'm glad to hear that that's been a priority in your conversations.
**Board Member:** Yes, certainly the financial challenges of District 58 with proration and categorical payments are not unique to our district. They're shared by many districts in DuPage and all the other collar counties, and that was something that all member districts expressed concern about. We're still working through all of that, but it is looking much better than the original plan that was put forward by SASID that several of us raised concerns about.
**Board Member:** Fantastic.
**Board Member:** Thank you. All right, that wraps up our reports today. We do have a discussion item tonight. It's called "Setting the Stage for Success in Kindergarten." I'd like to welcome Mr. Sisle.
---
**Mr. Sisle:** Good evening, everyone. Thank you. Tonight we're going to do a brief presentation and allow the board to have some discussion and ask some questions around a couple of ideas to further enhance our ability to set our kindergarten classrooms up for success at the start of each school year. These aren't new conversations internally. These are things we've been talking about for many years, as every grade level is unique. But the beginning of kindergarten presents some unique challenges and opportunities as we try to determine how we're going to begin the year for our youngest learners and how we're going to make sure that they are all set up for success in classrooms that are as well balanced and prepared for them as we can possibly create.
Those really are the two things we're going to focus on tonight. We want to make sure we're thinking about how to build that full school community for our kindergarteners and also make sure that we are taking advantage of every possible opportunity to gather the information that will help us make the most informed decisions about class composition. These ideas that you're going to hear presented tonight come out of discussions that have happened for many years, but really rekindled this fall and have been the product of a few meetings with a number of kindergarten teachers and a number of administrators — really good dialogue, really open conversation — and an experience where the group kind of coalesced behind two significant ideas that we're going to talk about tonight.
These aren't things that the board will formally vote upon, which is why it's a discussion item tonight, but we certainly wanted to give the board an opportunity to weigh in because it will have an impact on our incoming kindergarteners next year and potentially in the future. We think ultimately a very positive impact, but we certainly want to discuss that tonight.
Liz is going to join me on the next slide, and we're also happy to welcome a few guests with us tonight. You'll hear from Ally Hedman, kindergarten teacher at Whittier; Elizabeth Zawatsky, kindergarten teacher at Hillcrest; Christy Hopkins, kindergarten teacher at Indian Trail; and Marissa Sanderson, kindergarten teacher at Fairmont. You'll recognize them from their kindergarten-based décor today — 100th Day teachers. You'll also hear from Dr. Lisa Niforatos, the principal at Fairmont. Again, this is a representation of all of the folks that have been part of this conversation. We'll be excited to welcome all of them up, and then at the end I'll wrap things up and hear your discussion and questions.
---
**Liz:** Good evening, board. We wanted to start by sharing some of our current systems with you. We have a lot of really great traditional opportunities for our kindergarten families that give us a strong foundation.
Our kindergarten roundup is held in March. That is for parents and guardians. They come to the school for an evening and get an overview of the daily structure, some building logistics, and information about kindergarten readiness skills that they can work on with their students over the remainder of the school year and over the summer as they get ready for kindergarten.
We also send out surveys. Our Grove Preschool teachers will fill out surveys and have collaborative time with our kindergarten teachers for students who participate in that program, but we know that doesn't reach all of our students. So we do send surveys out to families — oftentimes we ask that the student's preschool teacher fills that out, but we also get information from families in those surveys as well.
We offer Leap Into Kindergarten, which is an optional summer school session for incoming kindergarten students. Historically, we have about 75 students who participate. We strategically group those students so that they are with peers from their elementary school, so that they see some familiar faces when they start kindergarten — but of course that program doesn't reach all students. We work on kindergarten readiness and socialization.
Our PTAs are fantastic. They run summer programs for our families — summer meetups at parks and on school grounds with popsicles and things like that — so that students and families can interact with one another. And then we hold an annual elementary school meet and greet, which historically has been a kindergarten-through-sixth-grade event, and this year would be the first time as a kindergarten-through-fifth-grade event. It's held a few days prior to school and is an opportunity for socialization and supply drop-off prior to the beginning of the school year.
---
**Ally Hedman:** Hi, everybody. I'm Ally Hedman, kindergarten teacher at Whittier. I'm going to talk about the first enhancement idea that we came up with, which would be a separate meet and greet.
Meet and greet right now is so fun because it is this massive reunification for everybody coming back to school from the summer. However, it does tend to get chaotic — revisiting old teachers, full hallways, and things like that. So we really want to try to separate the kindergarteners from that overwhelming experience and make it kindergarten-focused.
We're thinking of potentially moving it a day earlier, somewhat in the evening or after work hours, to try to get as much engagement as possible. This is just an opportunity for the kindergarteners to see their new school. They can go in the classrooms, walk the halls, and have it not be congested and loud and overwhelming. It gives them time to be focused with the teachers — teachers won't be pulled in a hundred different directions — and we can really focus on getting to know those kids for that first meet-and-greet opportunity.
It can also potentially provide an opportunity for the kids to try a story on the rug with the teachers while the parents separate and learn some of those first-day logistics, so they can get some of that covered before the big first day of kindergarten. Again, it's just another opportunity for the kids to get a little bit more comfortable with their teachers before that first day of school.
I'm going to pass it off to Elizabeth.
---
**Elizabeth Zawatsky:** I'm Elizabeth Zawatsky, kindergarten teacher at Hillcrest, and I'm also a parent of an incoming kindergartener in a District 58 school.
Along with providing kindergarteners with their own meet-and-greet experience, we'd also like to adjust what the first few days of school look like in order to build more balanced classes. What makes kindergarten unique is that we are building our classes with students from a very wide range of pre-kindergarten experiences.
The student information we gain right now comes mainly from surveys. It's relevant to those pre-kindergarten settings and not necessarily to our current classroom expectations. We feel that getting real-time information about students would be most beneficial, and that oftentimes within those first few days of school, we as teachers can already see adjustments that would be helpful in student groupings. We recognize that restructuring the beginning of the year would be an adjustment for parents and for students, but we're excited at the thought of creating a strong sense of community and welcoming kids into their home school.
What this could look like — we have used the terms "Camp Kindergarten" or "Team Kindergarten" in our discussions to reflect that students would be assigned a team at the beginning of the year rather than a classroom teacher for the first two days. Like camp, student groupings would change throughout the day depending on the activity. Students could wear a lanyard with their team color to indicate their core group, but with additional markings to show other groups they'd be a part of throughout the day. The benefits of this would be that students get to meet and interact with all of their kindergarten peers, and adults would be able to observe and interact with all students as well to gain as much information as possible about how to create those balanced classes.
---
**Christy Hopkins:** Hi, I'm Christy Hopkins, kindergarten teacher at Indian Trail. During the first couple of days of kindergarten, our primary focus is really teaching our new kindergarteners how to be a student within the school community. We want to focus on routines and relationships, building learner behaviors that help our students feel safe and confident and ready to learn, rather than conducting more academic or skill-based assessments. This structure is designed to create a predictable and welcoming start to the school year for our kindergarteners, and by focusing on those relationships and routines, we can really help students build confidence and feel secure in this new environment.
After those first two days of Camp Kindergarten, families would receive communication sharing their child's classroom teacher assignment for the remainder of the year. This allows us time to use the information and experiences from those two days to support balancing classroom communities. Beginning on that third day, students would join their assigned classroom teacher and begin building their classroom community. This is where individual classroom routines, relationships, and learning expectations would all be established and would hopefully support a strong and successful school year.
Both Marissa Sanderson and I are going to highlight some things from our prior Camp Kindergarten experience, which was back in 2019.
What I would tell you is that successfully initiating that process really did involve a lot of strong collaboration at the building level. Just like with anything new, communication was really key, and it took on a couple of different forms to make sure that parents and all of our families were getting the information they needed. This included an initial introduction letter about what Camp Kindergarten would look like, what they could expect, what their child could expect, and really the "why" behind the process — making sure that was very clearly communicated with some time between the different communications.
The other important thing that came out of that experience was ensuring that our families had points of contact during those first two days. We get a lot of contact from incoming kindergarten families, and while they didn't have that one point of contact with their classroom teacher, they did know who to contact, and communications back and forth were very fluid and included both teachers.
Our school team built a system where we were truly all hands on deck for that unique experience those first two days — kindergarten teachers, specialists, and the student support team — and that added to the success of the program. At Fairmont, and similarly at Whittier, we fielded really only about one or two additional phone calls from parents with logistical questions. They weren't concerns by any means, just a couple of questions about the process, which we were obviously happy to address. It wasn't a flood of calls, and that really speaks to the importance of proactive communication being in place prior to starting anything new.
From a global or building level, Camp Kindergarten was centered around kids rather than the class for those first two days, and it really provided students with an opportunity to learn about the school as a collective unit. It was a fun and supportive way to start the school year.
---
**Marissa Sanderson:** Hi there. There are some benefits I'd like to highlight from my experience with Camp Kindergarten in 2019.
First was a comprehensive knowledge of all of the students who came in. It really allowed both kindergarten teachers to develop a shared understanding of all the children in the grade level, not just the students assigned to your classroom. This included really important information such as medical needs and allergies, learning styles, social-emotional needs, and family dynamics. At the same time, the opposite was also true — students got to become familiar with both teachers and both classroom environments, giving them a great knowledge of both classes. After placements were finalized, students already felt a sense of familiarity and safety across the kindergarten wing, which helped reduce some of the anxiety of coming into kindergarten at the beginning of the school year.
Second, there was a stronger kindergarten community feel. It truly fostered a grade-level approach rather than a "my class versus your class" model. We were able to get more eyes on students and see if there were additional needs quickly. We also had extra staff in the classrooms — reading specialists, OT, and speech pathologists were able to push in early, observe students in their setting, and begin supporting right away. This collaborative approach emphasized that kindergarten is a shared responsibility and helped build a cohesive, supportive learning community for students from that very first day.
Third was increased flexibility and stronger instructional collaboration. Because both teachers were able to work with all of the students, instructional grouping felt more natural and fluid. While collaborative grouping can happen regardless, Camp Kindergarten made it more effective because students had already been formally introduced to both teachers, both classrooms, and the shared routines. It created a stronger sense of teamwork and made instructional decision-making more informed and intentional.
I also want to provide some context about kindergarten placement and articulation. In most grade levels, teachers spend a great deal of time at the end of the school year articulating with the following grade level's teachers — sharing detailed information about students' growth, their needs, and strategies that may have been helpful. This process allows the next teacher to get a valuable head start and insight into students' needs and successes. In kindergarten, we simply do not have that opportunity. While a small number of kids may come from Grove Preschool, the majority of students coming into our classrooms are brand new to us. We've tried to bridge that gap through parent surveys and outreach to preschools, but participation varies. As a result, kindergarten teachers often begin the year with very limited or no information on any of the children walking into the classroom.
Camp Kindergarten helped to create a form of articulation where one simply does not naturally exist. Even in a short time frame, it allowed teachers to collaborate, observe students, and begin discussing support strategies and skill development before students were permanently placed into a classroom. This early insight helped us make more informed decisions and allowed students to begin their kindergarten experience on a stronger footing.
I also want to acknowledge that Camp Kindergarten did require additional planning on the front end. My teaching partner and I at the time had met over the summer to coordinate logistics and prepare intentionally. However, we felt that that upfront investment resulted in a smoother, more natural flow once the school year began, and it ultimately increased our ability to be more proactive and less reactive as the year continued.
It really has been a topic of heavy discussion within our grade level, and my colleagues have continued to advocate for some form of Camp Kindergarten and have continually brought the idea up during grade level meetings. There seems to be a strong willingness to invest that time early if it means providing a more seamless, supportive transition for our youngest learners.
---
**Mr. Sisle:** So from here, you've heard the shell of some of the logistics. There's obviously a lot more to build out, but we wanted to make sure that we are all in alignment conceptually with moving forward so that we can begin to build out further details.
You heard about the importance of communication that would begin at our kindergarten roundups, which will begin to occur next month, and that really is our target to launch these ideas. We've been in communication with the entire kindergarten team, but we really want to take some collaborative opportunities to make sure that everyone is a part of this, which helps ensure consistency of experiences across the district. Some of that pre-planning work that Marissa was just talking about can be done now; some of it obviously we can't do until we have the list of kids and all of that information.
Our goal and our recommendation would be to implement both of these enhancements beginning this fall, with the recognition that — just as we do with all new things — there will need to be time to reflect upon the experience, to gain feedback from families that have gone through it, and to really see whether this is yielding the benefits we hope it will.
One thing that is important to re-emphasize is that when we did do this in two buildings, there really wasn't the hesitation in the parent community that we might have been concerned about. We had a couple of questions, but there was not a strong parental or familial concern that came out, and it ended up being a very positive experience that people still remember and occasionally talk about. So that would be our plan going forward.
At this point I want to open it up to board questions or any discussion you'd like to have around these ideas.
---
**Board Member:** Thank you. I'll open the floor. Does anybody want to start with a question?
**Board Member:** The only question I had — I think it makes sense, and it's exciting, not only for the teachers. I've got a little one who'll be coming into kindergarten shortly, so I think it makes a lot of sense and it would be exciting to know that this will help inform the decisions about their classroom placement. My only question was: was two days determined to be enough? It sounds like you have experience with the two days and have deemed it sufficient, but I just wanted to gut-check whether a longer period was considered.
**Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question, and we actually did have a slightly longer experience at Whittier during one of those two years where they went all the way to five days. The feedback we got was that that might have been a little long — we were ready to move forward after two or three. Looking at next year's calendar, with the way Thursday, Friday, and then Monday align as a natural break after the weekend, that's why we're looking at a two-day model for next year. The consensus from the limited number of people who had experienced it was that two or three days felt right-sized.
**Board Member:** Thank you.
**Board Member:** I had a similar concern, especially around families finding out their classroom assignment on a Friday. It seems like a lot to put on our kindergarten teachers — to get through those two days and then put the placement information in writing, and have families receive it on a Friday when they don't really have a point of contact for the whole weekend. I would just suggest giving a little more thought to whether that Monday could help with the transition.
**Mr. Sisle:** We've had some of those conversations, and I appreciate that perspective. That's one of the things we'll be finalizing in our next steps.
**Board Member:** Would all of our schools be having this? Are there schools that would only have one section of kindergarten where they would still have Camp Kindergarten, but the students would already know who their teacher was?
**Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question. This year we don't have any schools with a single section of kindergarten, but we don't know that will always be the case, so you're right — there could be some uniqueness there. The one other spot that will be unique is the LCRA dual language program, where there is only one dual language kindergarten teacher. We have talked about how to incorporate some of those Camp Kindergarten experiences for all of the students, even though some will know where they're ultimately going to land prior to that. If we were in a one-section situation, we would look at how to incorporate similar experiences, knowing that in the end there is only one kindergarten classroom.
**Board Member:** That actually makes me think about the dual language program in terms of special program kindergarteners — BEST RISE and DLP. I'm assuming those students would also be invited to attend with the regular education kindergarten teachers, but would those special program teachers also be there? How would that look for kids who might not be full time in the regular education kindergarten?
**Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question, and yes — we want to work to balance those experiences, but we also want to be cognizant of the level of inclusion that's planned for those kindergarten students and make sure that we are setting them up for success in the best way we can. Certainly we would want to join those experiences where possible, but we also need to consider the establishment of routines that some of those students will particularly benefit from based on—
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** At the end there is one kindergarten classroom.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** You just made me think of, when you brought up the dual language in terms of special program kindergarteners — Best Rise, DLP — I'm assuming those students would also be invited to attend with the regular education kindergarten teachers, but would those special programs teachers also be there? Like, how would that look for those kids who might not be full time in the regular ed kindergarten?
**[Dr. Harris]:** That's a great question, and obviously yes, we want to work to balance some of those experiences, but we also want to be cognizant of the level of inclusion that's planned for those kindergarten students in those programs and make sure that we are setting them up for success in the best way that we can. I think yes, certainly we would want to join those experiences where possible, but also the establishment of some of the routines that some of those students will benefit from, based on their individual plans, may lead us to some different ways of thinking about that as we get to the final preparations. Again, that'll be sort of where, as we're getting into the true lists of students, we'll be making some of those determinations.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** The other programs that were mentioned — the traditional programs such as the kindergarten roundup and the Leap into Kindergarten — would those still be in place and not affected at all by this change?
**[Dr. Harris]:** Absolutely. The roundup is primarily a family information night that would continue and be where we'd communicate some of these things. The Leap into Kindergarten program is planned as part of our summer experience. What's important to recognize in all of those things is that it is very challenging, if not impossible, to reach all students across those events — you may actually touch all the students, but what we're trying to accomplish is those moments where, at the beginning of the year, meet and greet is definitely most if not all, but then those first two days are truly all. And I think that's the difference, and that was really a big part of our conversation with the working group — that whatever we do, we really want to make sure that it is touching all of the students who are coming to us at the beginning of the year.
**[Unidentified Staff Member]:** One of the big events that we know is attended very well is kindergarten roundup. And that's why we wanted to have this conversation tonight before we move forward, because as Lisa shared, communication is just so important with this one, especially if families have a child entering kindergarten but they might have an older sibling. If you don't get that class notification in kindergarten, we want to make sure that families know about any potential changes, especially at the roundup. And of course we'll communicate it a hundred different ways, but we wanted to make sure that we have that conversation at the roundup so parents know that over the summer they wouldn't be getting a kindergarten class list, even though their other children may.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Do those roundups typically happen during the school day or after school?
**[Unidentified Staff Member]:** They're all in the evening at school.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** All in the evening. And do we provide a virtual option for families or a recording?
**[Unidentified Staff Member]:** We don't — the information that is presented is available, but we don't do it virtually live or anything like that, and I don't believe we have a recording at this point. During COVID we did that, but we have not continued that. Now it is more of a live event, but all of the information is sort of the launch of a lot of content, and then it's all very easily discoverable and pushed out in several different ways as we go through.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Perhaps just an option, if we are going to go with Camp Kindergarten, of having some sort of video versus a handout of what it should look like. I think the team did a great job of making it very student-centered and that it really is going to be meeting the needs of students and where they're at by matching them with a classroom that's going to help them grow. But I think it's translating that so families can understand how student-centered it really is. And it seems like there's a good amount of collaboration happening in these kindergarten classrooms anyway, because then it becomes less of a "who did they get" — they're getting the same experience across all 58 classrooms, and they see that partnership from the beginning as such a powerful instructional tool.
**[Unidentified Staff Member]:** Absolutely.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Other questions or comments?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Quick question, because we had done this in some spots previously. Just knowing some of the history here in Downers Grove — how have families and students handled the fact that now they've got a taste of the school and they might start to get an opinion on "I want to be in this class" or "I made a friend and I want to be with that friend"? How is that handled when it happens after they've started the experience, where people might start to form stronger opinions, as opposed to getting that notification, talking with your student in advance, and coming into the room with momentum? There's sort of a routine that families have of "we're going to check and this is who you have and we're going to introduce that person" and there's a sense of "I've got my momentum, I'm going to start to build a relationship." How did that go in the two years at one location and the one year at the other location?
**[Dr. Harris]:** We did not experience any of that, because again, those are things we'd all kind of anticipated — what happens when you get that comment or question or concern on day three or four? And we truly didn't have that experience. I can't tell you it will never happen, but it was not part of that experience. As we reflected on why that might be, there was definitely a lot of conversation about the deliberate efforts to make sure that everything was balanced during Camp Kindergarten — so no one group spent more time with Teacher A than Teacher B, and the groupings were moving around during the day so the kids were interacting with multiple other students instead of being in a consistent core group. I think it was that deliberate exposure to everything in a really balanced format that helped make sure those relationships were growing across the board, and we kind of minimized the risk of a child feeling "I am spending more time with Teacher A and therefore I'm going to feel a certain way if I end up in Teacher B's classroom." A lot of deliberate planning went into making sure that was balanced. But honestly, we did not experience that concern coming out of the initial experiences.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Perfect.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Looks like you have a question.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** No.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Okay. All right. Well, thank you.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Appreciate it.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Thank you to our kindergarten team.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Yeah, thank you all for being here tonight.
---
**[Board President Hughes]:** All right. Public comment time. This is an opportunity for members of the audience to share public comment with the board, but is not intended to be a time for members of the public to enter into a dialogue with the board. Issues raised during public comment may be addressed by administrative staff as appropriate or added to future agenda items. The board has allowed 30 minutes for public comment this evening. We ask you to keep it to a three-minute limit to give everyone an opportunity to speak. Do we have anything in the basket? We do not have anything in the basket. Is there anyone here wishing to make public comment? If so, please step up to the mic and state your name and attendance area or your place of employment.
All right, then we'll move on. Next up is going to be the approval of minutes. Are there suggested revisions to the minutes as presented in the packet of materials?
All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the minutes from the January 12th, 2026 regular meeting as presented?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** All those in favor?
**[Board Members]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Any opposed? The motion carried to approve the minutes of the January 12th, 2026 regular meeting as presented. Is there a motion to approve the minutes of the January 26th, 2026 financial workshop as presented?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Motion.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** All those in favor?
**[Board Members]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Any opposed? The motion carried to approve the minutes of the January 26th, 2026 financial workshop as presented.
We have a consent agenda tonight. Are there any items a board member would like to have considered separately? All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the consent agenda consisting of the personnel report and the financial statements consisting of the list of bills and summary?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** All right. Thank you. Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The consent agenda has been approved as presented in the packet of materials.
As part of this consent agenda, the board has hired a new principal for Whittier School. I'd like to hand it over to you, Dr. Russell, to introduce him.
---
**[Dr. Russell]:** Thank you very much. This is always one of the most exciting things I get to do as superintendent. I want to thank so many of the Whittier staff members who are here tonight to welcome our new principal.
As you know, Whittier principal Michael Krugman will retire at the end of this school year after 15 years of dedicated service to our school district and Whittier in particular. We will miss his leadership and will also just miss his presence and everything he does for Whittier. We certainly wish Michael and his family the very best in a well-deserved retirement.
Because this was a planned retirement, we began the principal selection process early, which ensured a strong pool of candidates and will allow for a smooth transition. This process included multiple interviews with administrators and staff, as well as input from Whittier staff, support personnel, families, and even a student council focus group — that was a lot of fun during the process.
From this collective feedback, Mr. Brian Bolton emerged as the strongest candidate, and we were pleased to recommend him for appointment as principal of Whittier School in the personnel agenda.
Brian brings more than 13 years of experience in education. He currently serves as the principal of Fullerton Elementary School in Addison School District 4. He has also served as an assistant principal in both Itasca and Lyons school districts and as a middle school social studies teacher. He began his career right here in District 58 as a student teacher at Herrick Middle School. Mr. Bolton holds a master's degree in educational leadership from NIU and a bachelor's degree in secondary education from Lewis University.
Brian also has strong ties to our community. He attended Indian Trail Elementary and O'Neill Middle School, graduated from Downers Grove South High School, and currently lives in Downers Grove with his wife and children, who joined us this evening — nice to see you kids.
He is eager to give back to the community that shaped him and to get to know our students, families, and staff in the greater Whittier School community. Please join me in welcoming Mr. Brian Bolton to Whittier School and as our new principal.
---
**[Mr. Bolton]:** Well, thank you, Board of Education and District 58 community. This is a bit of a surreal moment for me to be back here after all these years, in a district that gave me so much. My daughters are going to be going through Kingsley, so it's really exciting to be able to contribute to the Downers Grove community in this way. I'm really looking forward to working with Mr. Krugman, the Whittier community, and the Whittier teachers and staff who are here today, and to really hit the ground running to ensure a smooth transition, build on some traditions, and transition into the future. Again, my sincerest gratitude — thank you for giving me this opportunity, and I won't let you down. Thank you.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Thank you. Congratulations.
---
All right, we have a couple of items up for action tonight. First up is the 2026–2027 school fees. Is there a motion to approve the school fees for the 2026–27 school year as presented?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Any discussion? All right. Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried to approve the school fees for the 2026–27 school year as presented.
Next up, we have a resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force. Is there a motion to adopt the resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried to adopt the resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force.
I have a construction consent agenda tonight. Are there any items a board member would like to have considered separately? All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the construction consent agenda consisting of the elementary school kitchen equipment purchase?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Motion.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Thank you. Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The construction consent agenda has been approved as presented in the packet of materials.
I have a couple of announcements. Friday, February 20th at 7:00 a.m. will be our legislative breakfast, and then Monday, February 23rd at 7:00 p.m. will be the curriculum workshop, right back here at the Downers Grove Civic Center.
The board will now meet in closed session. Is there a motion to move to closed session to discuss the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of a specific employee of the district — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) — and the collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(2) — and for the discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under the Open Meetings Act, whether for the purpose of approval of those minutes by the body or the semiannual review of the minutes as mandated by Section 2.06 — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(21)?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Any discussion on that? All right. Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The board will now move into closed session after a short recess. It's 8:24 — let's try to be in there in four minutes, at 8:28.
All
right. Good evening everyone. This is
the regular meeting of the Downers Grove
School District 58 Board of Education
here on Monday, February the 9th, 2026
at 7 p.m. here at the Downers Grove
Civic Center. This meeting is being live
streamed uh for the public on the
Village of Downers Grove's YouTube
channel. Melissa, will you please call
roll?
>> Member Bernard
>> here.
>> Member Doshi
>> here.
>> Uh member Ellis is absent. Member Hannis
>> here. Member Olic
>> here.
>> Member Thomas
>> here. Member Hughes
>> here. Just as a quick note for everyone,
later on in the agenda, we had a
spotlight on our education foundation
that has actually been postponed uh
until April because the presenter is out
sick today. So, anybody that in case
somebody was here for that, just wanted
to give you a heads up. All right. And
then uh another quick announcement
tonight, members of the audience will
have an opportunity to provide public
comment. The board later on in the
agenda. The board asked anyone wishing
to comment to please fill out a card.
They're over there by the uh main door.
Uh fill out that card, indicate the
topic to be addressed, and then place it
in that basket. Uh I have allotted 30
minutes tonight for public comment. All
right, we're going to go ahead and start
as we always do with the pledge of
allegiance. I'd like to welcome up the
student of council from Henry Puffer
School to lead us.
I aliance to the flag of the United
States of America and to the republic
for which it stands. One nation under
God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all.
>> Thank you so much. Uh now I'd like to
welcome up the principal of Henry Puffer
School, Principal Leapart.
>> Good evening everyone. Uh it's an honor
for Henry Puffer to shine a spotlight on
all the wonderful things going on in our
school today. Uh we are going to have
some of our student council reps uh talk
to you as well as our PTA presidents and
then uh I'll share off uh a few of our
spotlights and some of the data that
we've been working through this year.
First up is Brook Vote.
>> Sorry about that.
I'm sorry. Um, good evening. My name is
Medina Abbas. I'm one of the fifth grade
student council representatives. This
year, the student council board has
several goals to make sure that we all
have a fun and successful year. Our main
goal was to take as many opinions from
the student body as possible and not
just come up with these ideas ourselves.
One of the most important goals was to
spread kindness throughout the school.
We did this through a kindness themed
spirit week and a kindness club.
Everyone is working hard to spread
kindness throughout the school and all
the grades. Our most powerful goal was
to have a fundraiser from many different
organizations. One of the organizations
that we helped was the fish food pantry
in Downer's Grove. We did this to help
families in Downer's Grove and close by
areas with food and supplies. Last but
not least, our final goal was to have
better communication with PTA members.
We were able to build a relationship
with PTA members by asking our student
council teacher sponsors to communicate
to the PTA for student council as we
donated to their event which helped many
puffer families. Last I mean sorry next
next you will hear from my fellow
council member Brooke Vote who will
discuss our exciting spirit week themes
at Henry Puffer.
Hi Brooke Bo. This year, student council
has done many fun spirit days at our
school. Some examples of these spirit
days are Red Ribbon Week, Holiday Spirit
Week, and PJ Day. These spirit days help
students show school spirit, and have
fun together. Some spirit days are also
fundraisers that help support school
activities. We ask students to
participate and enjoy dressing up with
their classmates. Spirit days are a
win-win because students have fun and
help the school at the same time. With
student council this year, we hope to
make school more exciting and create
even more fun spirit days.
>> Hi.
Hi. My name is Carson Sandage. I'm on
Henry Puffer Student Council. We have
done a number of fundraisers so far this
year. In December, we held a food drive
for Fish Food Pantry. You could get a
raffle. You could get raffle tickets. If
you donated food, you'd get a number of
raffle tickets to try to win a giant
bear. In total, we collected and donated
835 pounds of food to help people in our
community. We also set up a school shop
to raise money in school spirit. The
Henry Puffer Student Council is excited
to support our school community and
Diner's Grove community.
Hi, my name is Elena Collive and I am
one of the fifth grade student council
representatives and Henry Puffer loves
to help. We help by spreading kindness,
handing out blue tickets, school spirit
days, and our school store. Henry Puffer
uses the system of blue tickets. Every
time a kid makes a good choice, like
finishing their homework or helping a
peer, a teacher might spot them and give
them a blue ticket. Then at school
assemblies, our our principal, Mr.
Leart, picks one from all collected
tickets, and whoever that ticket belongs
to gets a prize. This is our way of
encouraging good choices. We have also
set up our school store. Every other
Wednesday, our representatives go to
each grade level and kids can buy
pencils, erasers, or pens. And fun
school supplies makes learning even more
fun. And these are just some of the ways
our student council helps Henry Puffer.
Next up are our PTA presidents, Jackie
Okowitz and Carrie McTeer.
>> Okay.
>> Hi, thank you for having us. That is a
really tough act to follow. Um, very
impressive work by our student council.
My name is Jackie Olitz.
>> I'm Carrie McTagard. We are uh in our
second year as PTA president at Henry
Puffer with the Puffer Hefty PTA. Um
want to highlight the rest of our board.
Um for a couple reasons. One, we have a
treasurer, Dan Hint, who's now in his
unprecedented second term. Um I don't
know if anybody knows, but it's not
often you see somebody raise their hand
to go another two years. So highlight to
Dan. Uh also really impressed with Henry
Puffer and our PTA in the sense that our
dads are really active in our PTA and
with all of our events. So want to make
sure that we gave a spotlight to that.
Emily Middle serves as our vice
president. So she is in her first year.
Um and then Sheila Brigette serves as
our secretary and she is also in her
second year. So with that, we're going
to talk a little bit about the ways that
we connect and support uh our puffer
community. Uh first, this year we did
our second Halloween bingo, but this
year our chairs took it to another level
and made it a no- waste event. So there
was absolutely no waste as a result of
this event that we held on site at the
school which was really extraordinary.
Great opportunity to show the kids that
we can continue to do fun things without
generating a lot of waste and creating a
lot of garbage that we're disposing. So
um want to highlight that long run we do
a uh long run to honor Gene Pogue. Um
but this year we added color to the run.
So that was really exciting for the kids
and they had a choice at the end of the
run if they wanted to run through the
color if they didn't if that was
something that was overstimulating for
them. but um an exciting new ad. And
then this year, Carrie, uh orchestrated
for us a poinsettia fundraiser, which
was new and fun and was a really nice
way at our waffle breakfast for families
to uh pick up their poinsettias and have
those for gifts for their families as
well. Um we continue to do a monthly
newsletter. This was new. I think one of
the things that PTAs really struggle
with is the fact that all different
generations want to communicate
differently. So there's email, there's
parent square, there's Facebook pages,
which we're now told are really archaic,
but it's the easiest one. Um, but we are
in our second year of offering a monthly
newsletter for our families in addition
to Mr. Leapart's puffer post so that we
can continue to communicate all the
things that are happening for um, our
staff and our students and our teachers.
And then uh, Kinder and new family
outreach. So this is one of the things
that Carrie and I are really, really
proud about. Every year we call every
single new kindergarten family to try
and touch base with them and welcome
them into Puffer. Um, and we also do
that for all of the new families
regardless of grade coming into our
school. We want them to one know who we
are, know who the PTA is and feel like
they have someone that they can reach
out to if they have questions versus I
don't want to contact the school yet.
That feels scary and what does this look
like and what's the ice cream social and
what is the dungeon if anybody doesn't
know what that is at Huffer. All right.
>> Uh, supporting our school and staff. So,
um, these are just a list of things that
we support, uh, within Henry Puffer that
the PTA brings to bear. Couple of things
I do want to highlight, though, um, that
are sort of in addition to what you will
probably hear from most, uh, parent
teacher organizations. We do a a staff
holiday gift drive. So, we want to make
sure that not just our teachers who feel
the love from their students every
holiday season, we also take donations
and then make a point that any um staff
member andor teacher that doesn't have
their own classroom has a holiday gift
as well from the PTA. So, um that is
that's a fun little thing that we add.
uh enrichment requests. We take our
largest fundraiser at the year and
figure out how much sort of overflow we
have from all of the events and um items
that we do cover and then we take it and
we give it back to the teachers as an
opportunity to ask for enrichments for
their classroom or things that serve the
school as a whole. So things like wobbly
stools in different classrooms, if
that's something a teacher has extra
need for, the PTA does what we can to
make sure that we can provide that um at
the end of each school year. Anything
else you want to highlight in here? Um,
oh, I the other thing that is new this
year, um, that Jackie's actually eating,
you said mine, I'll say yours. Um, is,
you know, usually, you know, the
students can do the school supply boxes
and we usually, um, the PTA usually
provides a box for each of the uh,
teachers as well for extra supplies.
What we've realized is there's like 25
pink erasers that the teachers don't
need anymore. So, we are doing something
new this year to collect um in January.
What are the items that you are missing?
What is the Kleenex? Mostly Kleenex.
>> Mostly Kleenex and Expo markers.
>> Markers. Um and then the money that we
would have spent on the boxes. We're
going we're using that to actually buy
the supplies that they need to help the
teachers in the classroom for the second
half of the year. So, first year we're
doing this, I think it's going to be
perfect. So, we're really excited.
Um, again, another litany of things that
we do just to support our our students
across the school. Um, one of the things
I'll say about our PTA and our just our
parent and, you know, caregiver
community and as a whole, we do
everything in our power to be able to
say yes to every request that comes from
our school. Um, we know that we have
varying degrees of resources and
exposure and access across our community
and so the PTA takes it very very to
heart to make the experience as
equitable for all of the students that
come into Puffer. So, um, here's sort of
just a list of the things that we do.
The class t-shirts are fun. Uh, Carrie
made a made a huge effort to bring those
back. So, each the PTA supports each
class having their own color and every
student having a t-shirt. These are
super fun for our teachers on field
trips because they can spot their
people. Um, and they've also been a
really fun way for each class to
represent themselves during school
assemblies. And it's kind of a rainbow
and litany of colors across uh the gym
while we have different assemblies,
which is really, really fun.
All right. Um, this is again just a list
of things and sort of showcasing um, a
lot of the the fun that we do have, but
more ways that we're supporting the the
family and the community. I talked a
little bit about Halloween bingo and it
being no waste. The other thing I would
highlight, uh, we do a we do a holiday
breakfast every year. It's usually a
pancakes and pajamas type of deal. This
year, our extraordinary parents took on
making waffles, which we thought was
crazy. Um, but they did it without a
hitch and it was awesome and people
loved it. So, both of those events
though are sort of self-funded and uh we
are able then to take all of the overage
from ticket sales and donations and we
give that money back to our our
community members. So, folks that need a
little additional support, we will end
up purchasing gift cards with that that
overage and then those are given out
over the holiday season to families in
our community.
>> Anything else?
>> That's the biggest one.
>> Okay,
that's it.
>> Yeah. So, just talk a little bit our
Panther Pride. If you weren't getting
that from us yet, then we haven't done
our job. This is
>> Oh, this is you.
>> Oh,
>> I edited this so I apologize.
>> I think I know where to start. So, I
will steal your thunder. Thank you for
having us. We appreciate it.
>> So, just for context, the dungeon is not
where we send misbehaving students.
Storage in the basement.
At Henry Puffer, our work truly starts
and ends with people. Our students,
teachers, families, and community. Our
Henry Puffer families come together once
a month, providing students with
meaningful opportunities to build
relationships with Puff Puffer Panthers
across all grade levels. Students remain
in the same Puffer family with the same
staff member from the time they join us
in kindergarten till the time they leave
us in fifth or sixth grade, fostering
strong connections and a deep sense of
belonging. Our school environment is
rooted in being respectful, responsible,
and safe. And we intentionally cultivate
a positive school culture grounded in uh
the tenants of the happiness advantage.
Our strong partnership with families is
reflected in our collaboration with our
amazing PTA and initiatives such as
watchd dogs and puffer reunions.
We're excited to welcome our Watchog
fathers and father figures each
Wednesday Wednesday as they spend half
the day uh supporting classrooms and
making lasting memories with their
children. We also host reunions for
former Puffer students who return to
visit their old stomping grounds. We
even had somebody come from as far as
Hawaii this year. This year we were
thrilled to partner with Lyman Woods to
create the Henry Puffer Garden on the
southwest corner of our building
connecting with our already um Hannah's
Hannah's garden. This special event
included Mr. Maywin. He's one of our
Puffer parents and a Lyman Woods member
who taught students about native plants
and worked alongside students and parent
volunteers to bring the garden to life.
We're hoping this is an outdoor space
our school and community will enjoy for
years to come. Students also thrive uh
through a wide variety of clubs and
activities including running club,
podcasting club, photography, kindness
club, student council, and our fifth and
sixth grade buddies.
Together, these opportunities create a
vibrant, inclusive environment where
students feel connected, supported, and
empowered to grow.
Our guiding beliefs center on the idea
that all students can learn and thrive
when our work is intentional, focused,
and aligned. We use a funnel approach in
which district goals inform our building
priorities. Those priorities guide our
classroom practice and instruction
ultimately impacts each individual
student. This alignment ensures
coherence and clarity across all levels
of work. We believe that what what what
we look for is what we find,
which reinforces the important of
directing our energy towards strengths,
effective practices, and factors within
our control.
When we intentionally seek out
positives, we're better positioned to
build upon them, just as overemphasis on
negatives can limit growth. Data plays a
critical role in informing instruction
and guiding decision-making, allowing us
to adjust practices in ways that enhance
student learning through cycles of
inquiry. We focus our uh our collective
efforts on instructing strategies that
yield greatest impact, supporting
continuous improvement in literacy,
math, and school culture and climate.
Our
first goal addresses an identified area
need based on the ECRA and NWA MAP data
and supports overall literacy
development while aligning with the
Illinois comprehensive literacy plan.
Teachers use student work assessment
data and teachers estimates of
instruction from John Hattie to plan
targeted instruction aligned to
benchmark advance with an emphasis on
intentional small groupoup instruction.
Resources such as Scholastic News and
Scope are incorporated across grade
levels to provide regular practice for
informational texts. Progress is
monitored through assessment reviews,
PLC plus data discussions, and
instructional planning with
effectiveness measured using our ECRA
propensity model, MAP results, and
ongoing feedback from our instructional
coaches.
Our
second goal focuses on developing deep
mathematical thinking, reasoning, and
transferable skills through the
intentional use of backwards design and
deliberate practice. Teachers have
integrated problem solving opportunities
into daily instruction. You utilizing
forefront map and acid data to monitor
progress and adjust lessons
and collaborate with grade level teams
to ensure alignment within all the
standards. Our instructional coaches
have in uh supported planning, data
analysis, and modeling effective
strategies. Progress is monitored
through student growth in the ACRA and
MAP assessments as well as benchmark
testing. Forefront reporting and team
data discussions with ongoing
accountability are provided through unit
meetings, team planning, and coaching
feedback.
Our third goal has focused on
strengthening trust and instructional
leadership to support a positive school
culture. Efforts have included structure
ILT collaboration to build collective
teacher efficacy, staff and committee
meetings that provide opportunities for
feedback and shared decision-making and
professional learning sessions that
incor incorporate teacher input into
instructional planning. Classroom
rotations during our staff meetings have
highlighted teacher-led strategies,
successes, and innovations. Progress has
been monitored through ongoing check-in
surveys, ensuring ongoing accountability
and continuous growth in power culture
and climate.
Our winter map results so show some
pretty strong progress for our students.
In math, students achieved in the 82nd
percentile nationally in the winter.
That's an increase up from the 65th
percentile in the fall. In reading, our
students scored in the 78th percentile
nationally, up from the 64th percentile
in the fall. Student growth, student
growth was also pretty impressive with
math growth in the 84th percentile
nationally and reading growth in the
74th percentile.
Um,
our our winter ECRA data provides
another snapshot of our student
performance and shows meaningful
improvement from where we began in the
fall. ECRA is going to offer a different
perspective than MAP as its calculations
are based on where students finished in
the previous spring and do not include
students in grades 1 through six who
were new to us this year. Overall, 74%
of our students met benchmark uh
representing a 6% increase from fall and
86% demonstrated high or expected growth
an increase of 9%. The overall growth
effect size improved to negative.01 01
which was a 0.13 gain from the fall
which is pretty significant. And in math
uh 70% of our students met their
benchmark which was up seven uh 7%. With
85% of our students showing higher
expected growth which was an increase of
13%.
Uh with the uh growth effect size u
improving to negative.05 which is also a
gain of.37.
In reading, 79% of our students met
benchmark, which was an increase of 6%
and 89% uh demonstrated high or expected
growth, which is up 4%. Uh with a growth
effect size of positive 03, which is uh
slightly lower than it was in the fall.
uh breakdown. Uh as far as grade levels
concerned, our winter growth data for
Henry Puffer shows generally strong
performance across grade level cohorts
with uh clear areas for some targeted
targeted support in math. Uh
kindergarten, second, third, and fourth
grade cohorts demonstrated positive
growth in effect sizes with third grade
uh our third grade cohort showing
particularly strong growth. The
kindergarten and first grade cohorts had
high percentage of students meeting
benchmark though first grade growth was
notably lower uh likely influenced by uh
uh this cohort finishing last year in
the 99th percentile.
In the upper grade level cohorts, fifth
and sixth grades had fewer students
meeting benchmark um but most uh
demonstrated expected growth
highlighting study progress alongside
opportunities for learning uh and
closing those achievement gaps. in
reading. The kindergarten, second,
third, and fifth grade cohorts posted
positive growth effect sizes. The first
and fourth grade cohorts had solid
benchmark align uh attainment but
slightly negative growth uh indicating
uh closer to expected levels rather than
accelerated. The sixth grade cohort de
demonstrated expected growth for most
students, though the growth effect size
was slightly negative, suggesting a need
for some targeted support to strengthen
progress. Overall growth tends to show
uh strong foundational performance
across the school with opportunities to
improve uh consistently and accelerate
learning particularly in first, fourth,
fifth, and sixth grade cohorts.
One area that we continue to closely
monitor is the growth of our subgroups.
Uh winter growth data for Henry Puffer
School shows that all student subgroups
achieved growth within the expected
range with some groups demonstrating
particularly strong progress. In math
are uh English learners, Asian students,
and other uh student groups showed
positive growth effect sizes while
black, Hispanic, IEP, and low-income
students had slightly lower growth uh
but still within the expected range.
Gender differences were minimal with
male students showing slightly higher
growth than females. In reading, our
ELEL's, Asian uh and other student
groups posted positive growth while
black, Hispanic, IEP, and lowincome
students had slightly negative growth
effect size. Again, all with the in the
expected range. Overall subgroup data
highlight steady progress across student
uh our school while identifying
opportunities to accelerate learning for
specific groups to further close those
achievement gaps.
One of the metrics our team tracks is
percentage of students performing in the
average quintile and above on MAP o over
time. This provides us a snapshot of
student achievement growth over the past
three and a half years. We typically see
uh the largest gains from fall to winter
with slight regression from winter to
spring um and more pronounced regression
from spring to fall reflecting both
summer slide and the impact of our more
transient student population. Despite
this, the overall trend line in both
math and reading remains positive.
Currently 92 and a half% of our students
are performing in the average quintile
and above in math and uh about 88% of
our in the average quintile and above in
reading. Um that's that's an increase of
7% in math and four and a half% in
reading from last winter. Um I won't
continue on with any more of these
numbers, but I do thank you for the time
and the opportunity to shine a spotlight
on Henry Puffer School.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you so much.
>> THANK YOU.
FOR ALL OUR STUDENT council members, we
do have some gifts for you. So, thank
you for being here tonight.
All
right. Listed on tonight's agenda are 20
communications received by the board.
Are there any additional communication a
board member would like to share at this
time?
>> Okay,
that brings us to our spotlight. But
we're going to start off tonight with
our 10-year health life safety review
with Kevin Bart.
>> Okay.
>> Hello. Um I'm Nishi Sha with Whiten
Company. I'm an architect and project
manager. I've been working on all of
your referendum projects for the
schools.
So, um, every 10 years, the Illinois
State Board of Education requires, uh,
the district to have a licensed
architectural professional walk all your
buildings to make sure they're in
compliance with applicable building
codes. Um, so each building's on a
10-year cycle. The majority of your
buildings are on uh 10ear cycles from
2015 into 2025 with exception of Henry
Puffer as you guys acquired that
separately. So that's on a 2023 um,
cycle. So Henry Puffer was done two
years ago and we completed that at that
time. Um we currently have the remaining
schools that we need to complete for the
10-year life safety because we have all
the construction projects from the
referendum. We uh have schedule these to
happen after all those projects are
done. So you're just kind of having
minimal um violation items on there. So
we at this round we are looking at nine
buildings, your two middle schools that
were completed this December and seven
elementary schools uh the phase one and
phase two elementary schools. So,
Hillrest, Highland, Whittier, uh,
Fairmount, Kingsley,
uh, Leester, and I'm missing one.
>> Highland
>> Indian Trail. Thank you. I was like,
>> that was still pretty impressive.
>> Um, the remaining schools, the three
elementary schools will be looking at
the fall of this year after they're
completed the summer projects. So, Bair,
Elsier, and Pierce Town will be looked
at after that those are completed. Um,
we're required to complete four
documents. The first is um existing
building conditions. So we have to write
narratives about what your building
systems are now and what codes apply. We
have to provide updated floor plans
showing uh life safety data meaning
what's the rating of the walls um what's
the mechanical system and then what
where are your smoke detectors and
things like that. And then the main part
of it is we have to provide violations.
So we have to walk your buildings check
that they the code of when they were
built and verify that everything's um
you know everything's in compliance.
We um walked the buildings for these f
first nine um after construction was
done. So either the fall of this year or
this uh this January um and we had the
preliminary findings and we walked
through that with um Kevin Bartau and
Greg Harris a week or so ago.
So um process and methodology. So we did
a lot of you know projects already. So
this we have a really a lot of your
buildings in really good shape. So we
have minimal amount but there's three
different categories for um your
violations. One is urgent. Uh so that
means it's really immediate hazard or
safe life or safety to the students. Um
they must be addressed in one year. So
that the ISB does tell you you need to
address these docu these items within a
year. Um this can be something
structural something for exiting um fire
detection to make sure all your smoke
detectors are working things of that
nature. So if there's some type of event
students can exit safely and is safe in
the building. Uh the next one is
required. These are um you have to do
within 5 years. So things like
electrical outlets that don't have are
near water and need that the GFCR. Um
and then the last is C which is
recommended which is within 10 years. Um
these are not required but you can add
them on there. They're typically
accessibility sidewalks, playgrounds,
things like that that might be in
condition that maybe there's a tripping
hazard or something like that.
So generally these are uh in your
building in really good shape. The
middle schools because they had
comprehensive updates during the uh the
referendum projects don't have any
violations. We really touched every part
of that building. All you know
everything's in compliance there. Um
your remaining elementary schools had
some minimal items. Um so we have about
$50,000 in urgent. Um that is really um
you might have a penetration in a wall
that needs to be sealed. um there might
be a door that needs to swing a
different way. Most of these were items
of in areas that we did not touch during
the referendum projects. So, there were
an addition to that. Um you have about
20,000 $3,000 in um five years. So, this
might be um outlets and classrooms that
are near sinks. You have a lot of sinks
in your elementary school classrooms.
There's probably an outlet there that's
been there for 50 years that needs to be
updated to have the correct um safety on
there. And then C is recommended. So,
there's the majority is in the
recommended item. These are not
required, but there are things like um
wittier paving. We know that there's a
lot of bumps and stuff in that in this
asphalt there. Um or um areas where you
might have fire or certain glass that if
you break it, you'll need to replace it.
So those are all 10ear recommended
items. Um so these are typically the
seven elementary schools are here. Um
the two middle schools, we did not have
any violations. So we'll be completing
the remainder in the fall. I'll see you
here about a year from now.
>> Questions or comments at the stamp?
We
>> you're gonna ask the same question. I
am.
>> I'm assuming yes, but wanted to ask did
we do a review of those items
particularly urgent required and
identify any that were in the scope of
where we had I'll say enhancements over
the past two years, three years of
projects that we would have expected our
contractors to be accountable.
>> When we walked, we did when we walked
those buildings, we did say, is this
something that was part of the
referendum that that should have been
taken care of versus is it a separate
item? So we did discern those items
>> everything on this list then
not within that not within that bucket
and those things were then were handled
by the contractors
>> correct.
>> I was going to ask if we can get the
list.
>> Yes, I believe that was on the agenda,
right?
>> I think it was on the agenda earlier but
now all we see is the presentation but
the individual reports were there this
morning.
>> They were let me check.
And right now they're drafts. We'll have
to upload it to um ISB once you guys
approve it and it is a draft version
currently.
>> Is it the uh
>> click the link?
>> Is it the survey?
>> So this should be the violations. Um
>> yeah, but it's done by individual school
then.
>> Yes, it is. Okay.
>> Yeah, if you click the link that says
survey.
>> Okay. Sorry, I didn't know what the main
files
Yeah, it looks like the top kind of got
it.
>> Nice.
>> And then it takes you to the drive
>> and then
>> they're all in there.
>> I see. Thank you.
>> And if any board member wants more
specifics on anything that you see in
the list, um Kevin Bardau and and um
Needy, we can get that to you in and an
update.
>> Right. Anything else? Any other comments
or questions?
Well, we appreciate your time. Thank you
very much.
>> Thank you, Navy.
>> All right. And like I said earlier,
we're going to be skipping the education
foundation presentation tonight. That
has been moved to April. So, that brings
us to the reports of the board. Uh we'll
start with the superintendent report.
Dr. Russell.
>> Thank you. So, for my report tonight,
I'll start off with personnel. Tonight's
personnel report is more of a preview.
At our March meeting, there will be two
topics discussed. First, Justin will
share a high level preview of staffing
planning for next school year and an
update on where we're at in that
process. Additionally, we will discuss
the 202728
calendar with the hope of approving that
calendar at the April meeting. We're
looking forward to more complete
alignment with district 99's calendar
because construction will no longer
impact our start and end dates. As a
reminder, the 2627 calendar has already
been approved and that's up on our
website uh that anyone can take a look
at. In terms of curriculum and
instruction, uh this past weekend the
band and orchestra solo fest was held
and it was a huge success. Um more than
495 solos and ensembles were performed
at this event. I had to do a double take
when I read that 495. Uh but we have a
very robust uh performing arts program
here in our district and uh they did
just a great job. So of course we want
to thank our instrumental music
department for all their hard work
planning and preparing and to our parent
volunteers who helped uh keep this day
running. As you can imagine, when you
have almost 500 kids, it requires a lot
of volunteers and um we're really
grateful for everyone. It was a
wonderful uh event. Speaking of
wonderful events, we're looking forward
to the District 58 Festival of Music,
which will take place next week on
February 19th and it'll be held this
year at Downer South. We alternate the
two high school venues. Uh this is
always a fun event when O'Neal and Hera
combine their bands, orchestras, and
choirs. So, uh you don't want to miss
that one if you're available on that
evening. On February 23rd, we will also
hold our curriculum workshop. Uh it will
be located here. At the workshop, we'll
share uh the winter data snapshot as
well as updates on the middle school map
pilot and the work of many of our
district committees. We'll also have a
discussion about athletics and
activities for next school year at the
middle schools.
Finance, Dr. Harris is going to give
that in his CSBO report, so we'll skip
that one. uh for technology. This past
Friday, District 58 sent benchmark
assessment reports home via Parent
Square via its secure document delivery
system. Sending reports home digitally
is more secure, efficient, and
cost-effective than printing reports for
all students. For security reasons,
these reports are not sent as
attachments. Instead, you are required
to sign into your Parent Square account
to view the reports. Uh but the nice
thing about that is once you do that,
they're always there and they're
accessible for our parents. So, we
appreciate uh that feature in Parent
Square, and that's one of the new uh
advantages of our new system for special
services. District 58 looks forward to
offering extended school year
programming to eligible students with
disabilities. Students who qualify for
ESY uh through their IEP will receive a
direct invitation and more information
on this program for their child's from
their child's case manager. Dates for
the program will be June 12th through
July 14th. Um, sounds like a long way
away, but it'll come very quick. As
today, as our kindergarten teachers will
uh demonstrate, it was our hundth day of
school. It's a little bit later this
year because of our late start, but uh
we're getting closer and closer toward
uh the end of the school year. For
public relations, just a reminder, our
legislative breakfast that was postponed
due to the extreme cold day. Uh we have
the new date, so District 58 will host
its annual legislative breakfast. It's
it's really a forum. It's not
necessarily a big breakfast. On Friday,
February 20th at 7 a.m. at Eric Middle
School. Several state legislators are
expected to attend. The event provides
an opportunity to engage in discussion
around key issues impacting District 58
in the broader school community. I want
to thank our legislative committee for
their hard work organizing this forum
every year. It's always a uh a good
event and it's nice to speak with our
legislators. We also have uh sent out
both of our annual surveys. That's the
district 58 climate survey as well as
the five essentials survey. We encourage
families to uh take both of those
surveys and the five essential survey.
Uh we also make that available to all
staff and our students will also take
that in grades four through eight. So
those are coming up. That concludes my
report.
>> Fantastic. Any questions or comments on
the superintendent report? All right.
And that brings up our monthly business
and treasures report. Dr. Paris.
>> Good evening, members of the board. Um,
tonight I will speaking I will be
speaking on just two topics. Uh, the
first one is the year-to- date report
um, and the treasures report which is
included in your packet. Um, of note I'd
like to offer just a little bit of
analysis on the year-to- date report.
Um, on the revenue side, um, you know,
the the, um, some of the things that are
are drawing my attention are I think
we're we're running low on our state
specialed funding. Um, and we think
we're going to be off there a little bit
that that has to do with proration um,
getting us a little bit more deeply than
we thought it would. But there's there's
some bright spots as well. Um, one of
them being um, interest revenue. Um, and
um, some of the big ones that we count
on, EVF, property taxes are all running
really well. um our our local revenue in
the other column is also um something
that is a a bright spot for us. So um
you know there's there's some there's
some places where we're off to the
negatives, some places to the off where
we're off to the good. It kind of
balances out on the expenditure side. Um
I'm looking very closely at um salaries
and benefits since those are our biggest
costs. Um I think we're probably a
little bit off um on salaries, a little
bit under um a little bit over on on
benefits, especially in in the
educational fund. But since um the
salaries number is much much bigger than
the benefits number, I'd much rather be
off um on to the neg to to the good on
salaries and than than to the bad on
salaries. So I'm I'm I'm pleased with
that there. I don't think there's
anything to be concerned about there.
Um, I'll pause for a second and just um
see if any board members have any
questions on any of the of the monthly
reports.
>> Okay. And the other thing is just an FYI
item for the board of education for the
community. Um, very soon the uh district
will be putting out our request for
proposals for our food service program.
Um, we are acknowledging that the boards
um has taken a uh has a new vision for
what that program should look like,
which would be um hot meals for all
students K through prek through No, no,
not pre-K, K through eight. Um,
previously that only been available at
the at the middle schools. Um, we do
have currently two vendors who are doing
our our our middle school program and
our our elementary program. So, we are
going to um be looking for one vendor to
to take care of the whole thing. Since
the scope of the project has changed, we
are going out for an RFP. Um you will
see um actually in in tonight's agenda
the the the u the realization of this
vision from the board of education in
our construction consent agenda since
we're purchasing a lot of equipment for
our kitchens thanks to a grant provided
by Representative Anstafa and um so this
is just kind of an FYI there's there's
there's no news yet just just that that
we are in the process of moving forward
on this and we expect to um bring a
recommendation to the board at the May
or the June meeting at the latest. Any
questions on that?
>> Anyone?
>> Again, we're very excited to receive
this uh kitchen grant um from
Representative Saba Murray. Um like our
playgrounds, this is a huge help. Um we
had always scheduled to uh take the
interest money from the referendum and
to apply that for the kitchen equipment
because that was something that we
discussed after uh the referendum. Uh
but uh this grant really really does uh
help us out and almost erases the entire
cost of um what it's going to cost to
put this kitchen equipment in. As a
reminder for the board of education, uh
last summer we were able to complete the
kitchen work for the phase 2 schools. So
this summer we'll be doing the kitchen
work at the phase one elementary schools
and the phase three elementary schools.
So we'll be back in the phase one
schools. Uh some of the schools are bit
easier to do. Uh Henry Puffer is a good
example because they used to have a food
service program when it was its own
district. Um other schools are a little
bit more challenging when you think
about a school like Highland or Lester.
Um the kitchen area is that small room
off the gym and there are building code
requirements that we have to squeeze in
there. So I want to thank our architects
for getting very creative with that. But
um this is something that we have been
hearing about. I know the board has
heard about it. I've certainly heard
about it since I've been the
superintendent here. We are one of the
only remaining districts around that um
does not offer a food service program
for our elementary students. With so
many of our families having uh you know
two uh two incomes and both parents
working, this is a really good thing for
our families. It's also a really nice
thing for any student that qualifies for
free and reduced lunch so that they're
able to get a consistent meal uh day in
and day out at our schools. So uh we're
very happy uh to move this forward. Next
year will certainly be a learning year.
uh you haven't done something in 100
plus years and then we're going to
implement it. I'm sure there will be
some bumps in the road. Uh but uh with
the new middle school kitchens, we're
very excited about the plan and the roll
out.
>> Fantastic. Questions or comments?
>> Appreciate it. Thank you. All right,
onto our committees. The policy
committee has not met since the last
board meeting. Neither has the
legislative committee. Uh the financial
advisory committee has met. Um though
you heard a little bit about that in the
report. We went over the year-to- date
report. Uh things in general were
looking good. We talked about the the
food service RFP. And the only thing I'd
add is that uh uh just that part of this
is Dr. Russell was alluding to we have
very small kitchens in our grade school.
So it's like a hub and spoke model and
the dividing line will be the the train
tracks. So each uh middle school will
then be the starting point of the food
and then it's going to be more like
warmers and kind of finishers at the
elementary schools. Also, a big part of
that bid is going to keep the grade
schools at least in the opening bid here
to keep them on a most likely a
pre-order. So they pre-order for the
week. They'd get a menu. Uh that helps
us keep down food waste um and stuff to
the elementary schools. uh you know as
we're bringing out delivering and making
sure kids actually have the opportunity
to get the meal that they were looking
for as opposed to something running out
um in the process. So uh the RFP bid is
in there in our in ourh packet tonight
that is uh this is that first phase
which will go out and we're looking
forward to getting one vendor to take
care of this whole piece. If you
remember, uh, Quest at the time could
not kind of deliver to the great schools
at a at a price that made sense and they
were willing to just kind of hold back,
but they they even shared, I think,
their ordering system at that point to
do it to help us kind of bridge this
gap. And now we can't do a major change
without going back out to RFP. So, this
is one of those things that is required
for us, even if it wasn't necessarily
required for us in in timing wise. we
had done a one-year contract and then
extended it with um Quest currently. Uh
the other big piece we talked about was
policies. Um there's really two big
policies that previously had come out of
uh the financial advisory committee and
that was our fund balance policy and our
capital policy.
Now that we're coming out of a
referendum, we're really looking at um
making some adjustments uh to that and
really looking at ways to tie that to
our long-term needs, specifically
looking out five years and making sure
that we're funding this in a way. We're
looking at uh it's really looking right
now at at starting off at about 750,000.
Uh we've been looking at the language
around that, making sure that we're
within the boundaries of what is
required by law as well as making sure
that we are within the boundaries of
what we're actually going to need to be
able to cover over the next several
years. As you may know, um uh our our
DSAB, our actual bonding ability is
going to be need needed to be used for
other reasons. And so therefore, we need
to make sure that we have the ability to
maintain things. So, uh, a good frame of
reference and one of the reasons why the
750 stands out so much is that's about a
half a roof that we're sort of putting
away per year and kind of in that cycle.
Um, roofs are one of our expensive
things that come up that we have to deal
with at the spring league. The um, the
other one is our fund balance policy.
We're really looking at reframing that
looking at as we've dialed everything
into being now focused purely on a cash
basis as opposed to toggling back and
forth between acrruel and cash. It's
going to make this approach a lot easier
for us. And part of it is what can we
cover now? What do we need to cover to
because right now we still have our
arbitrage dollars. So we're we're in in
a position where we need to set
ourselves up to be at that minimum
number um in in a year or two. But what
what should that exactly look like
exactly how that and how should we
define it? We were looking at sort of a
blend of both talking about the overall
percentage to expenses as well as tying
that back to the number of days cash on
hand because of the way that we get
funded at the beginning at the end of
our our our fiscal year. One of the nice
things is if we can show at a given
graph like at these points then this is
where our our our low cash point comes
uh it's easy for us to see whether or
not we're capable of covering uh our
expenses throughout the year. So, uh,
we're going to be getting some language
together over the next couple meetings
and we'll be bringing that forward
before the end of the school year this
year. So, later on, you know, as we get
into spring, we're going to get some new
language around that that we think um,
not only covers what we need to do, but
sets us up to be successful. Uh, with
that, Steve, did I miss anything?
>> No, you you got it covered.
>> Okay. Uh, questions or comments uh, from
the board.
Okay.
And um the district leadership team has
not met, neither is health and wellness.
Uh we do have a SAS report. Dr. Russell,
back to you.
>> Yeah, the biggest thing that we're
working on with SASID right now centers
on uh SASID's facilities. Uh so
shortterm uh figuring out all the leases
for classroom spaces. As you know,
district 58 will house more SAS
classrooms. Uh so we're going over all
those with the executive director, not
only here in district 58, but for all of
the members in SAS. long term, uh,
SASID's facility and finance committees
are working on, um, some options for the
co-op, uh, in particular with their
district office and transition program.
Um, the current space on Octton Avenue
and Lyall is not really the most
conducive to not only the transition
program, but to the office in general.
Um so they are looking at uh different
options of purchasing um a building uh
that can now house their um
administrative center as well as the
transition program. Uh one of the things
that I love to hear as a superintendent,
I'm sure the board will love to hear
this too, is we are only looking at
costneutral options, meaning that member
districts will not have to incur any
debt uh as a result of what Sassid is
trying to do in terms of the long-term
uh facility plan. So, we're looking at
um spreading the debt out over several
years like we do in local school
districts um to make sure that um SASID
can be the one who issues any debt
certificates and uh the local districts
would not have to absorb that. So, more
to come on that uh but we are getting uh
closer. I do serve on the finance
committee for SASID. So, uh, paying
particular close attention to how that
might impact, uh, member districts while
still ensuring that we have a great
facility for not only our transition
program, uh, but for the administrative
offices as well.
>> Questions or comments?
I just want to say that uh, I think that
has been a concern of ours like the
overall cost. Obviously, we're dealing
with some financial challenges here in
general. So, I'm glad to hear that
that's been a priority in your
conversations. Yeah, certainly the
financial challenges of district 58 with
um you know proration and categorical
payments are not unique to our district.
They're unique to many districts in DUP
page um in all the other color counties
and so that um was something that all
member districts expressed concern about
and so we're still working through all
of that but um it is looking much better
than uh the original plan that was uh
put forward by SASID that several of us
raised concerns about.
>> Fantastic.
>> Thank you. Um all right, that wraps up
our reports today. We do have a
discussion item tonight. It's called
setting the stage for success in
kindergarten. So, I'd like to welcome
Mr. Sisle.
>> Hello.
>> Good evening everyone. Thank you. Um,
tonight we're going to do a brief
presentation and allow the board to to
have some discussion and ask some
questions around a couple of ideas to
further enhance our ability to set our
kindergarten classrooms up for success
at the start of each school year. These
aren't new conversations internally.
These are things we've been talking
about for many years as every grade
level is unique. But that beginning of
kindergarten presents some unique
challenges and opportunities as we try
to determine how we're going to begin
the year for our youngest learners and
how we're going to make sure that they
are all set up for success in classrooms
that are as well balanced and prepared
for them as we can possibly create. And
so those really are the two things we're
going to focus on tonight. We want to
make sure we're thinking about how to
build that full school community for our
kindergarteners and also make sure that
we are taking advantage of every
possible opportunity to gather the
information that will help us make the
most informed decisions about class
composition and things like that. And so
these, you know, these ideas that you're
going to hear presented tonight come out
of discussions, like I said, that have
that have happened for many years, but
really sort of rekindled this fall and
have been the product of a few meetings
with a number of kindergarten teachers
and a number of administrators. really
good dialogue, really open conversation,
and an experience where the group kind
of coalesed behind two significant um
ideas that we're going to talk about
tonight. These aren't things that the
board will formally vote upon, which is
why it's a discussion item tonight, but
we certainly wanted to give some
opportunity because it will have an
impact on our incoming kindergarteners
next year and potentially in the future.
We think ultimately a very positive
impact, but we certainly want to discuss
that tonight. Um Liz is going to join me
on the next slide and then we also are
happy to welcome um a few guests with us
tonight. You'll hear from Ally Hedman,
kindergarten teacher at Whittier.
Elizabeth Zawatsky, kindergarten teacher
at Hillrest. Christy Hopkins,
kindergarten teacher at Indian Trail.
Marissa Sanderson, kindergarten teacher
at Fairmont. You'll recognize them from
their kindergarten based decor today of
how 100 day teachers. You'll also hear
from Dr. Lisa Niferatus, the principal
at Fairmont. And again, this is sort of
a representation of all of the folks
that have been part of this
conversation. So, we'll be excited to
welcome all of them up and then at the
end I'll kind of wrap things up for us
and hear your discussion and questions.
>> Good evening board. So, we wanted to
start by sharing some of our current
systems with you. We have a lot of
really great um tradition um
opportunities for our kindergarten
families um that really give us a strong
foundation. Um so, our kindergarten
roundup is held in March. That is for
parents and guardians. They will come to
the school for an evening and get an
overview of the daily structure, some
building logistic information, and then
kindergarten um information about
kindergarten readiness skills um that
they can work on with their students
over the course of the remainder of the
school year and um over the summer as
they get ready for kindergarten. We also
send out surveys. So, our um Grove um
preschool teachers will fill out surveys
and have collaborative time with our
kindergarten teachers for our students
that um participate in that program. but
we know that that doesn't hit all of our
students. So, we do send surveys out to
families. Um oftentimes we'll ask that
there um a student's preschool teacher
fills that out, but um we also get
information from the families in those
surveys as well. We do offer leap into
kindergarten, which is an optional
summer school session for incoming
kindergarten students. Um historically,
we have about 75 students who
participate in the leap into
kindergarten program. We do
strategically um group those students so
that they are with peers from their
elementary district or their elementary
school, I'm sorry. Um so that they do
see um some familiar faces when they
start kindergarten, but of course that's
not meeting all of the students um in
terms of participation in that program.
We work on kindergarten readiness and
socialization.
Our PTAs are fantastic. They run um
summer programs for our families um
summer meetups. They'll meet at parks.
They'll meet on the school grounds, have
popsicles, things like that, so that the
students and families can interact with
one another. And then we hold an annual
elementary school meet and greet.
Historically being a kindergarten 6
through sixth grade um event, this year
um you know would be that first time of
kindergarten through fifth grade. It's
held a few days prior to school and it
really is um a opportunity for
socialization and supply drop off prior
to the beginning of the school year.
Hi everybody. Um, again I'm Ally Hedman.
I am kindergarten teacher over at
Whittier. I'm going to talk about the
first enhancement idea that we came up
with, which would be a separate meet and
greet. Um, so meet and greet right now
is so fun because it is this massive
reunification for everybody back to
school from the summer. However, it does
tend to get towards the chaotic with um
re visiting old teachers, you know, full
hallways and things like that. So, we
really want to try and separate the
kindergarteners from that overwhelming
experience and really make it
kindergarten focused. Um so, we're
thinking of potentially moving it a day
earlier um somewhat in the evening or
after work hours um to try and get as
much engagement as possible. Um, and
this is just an opportunity for the
kindergarteners to see their new school.
They can go in the classrooms. They can
walk the halls and have it not be
congested and loud and overwhelming. Um,
and it gives them that time to be
focused with the teachers. Um, teachers
won't be pulled in a hundred different
directions. Um, we can just really focus
on getting to know those kids for that
first meet and greet opportunity for
them. Um, and then also it can
potentially provide an opportunity for
us to have the kids try a story on the
rug with the teachers and the parents
can then separate and try or learn some
of those first day things and they can
kind of get some logistics covered
before that big first day of
kindergarten. Um, and again, it's just
another opportunity for the kids to get
a little bit more comfortable with those
teachers before that first day of
school.
I am going to pass it off to Elizabeth.
>> I'm Elizabeth Sawadsky, um, kindergarten
teacher at Hillrest and then I'm also a
parent of an incoming kindergartener in
a district 58 school. Um, along with
providing kindergarten with their own
meet and greet experience, we'd also
like to adjust what the first few days
of school look like in order to build
more balanced classes. So what makes
kindergarten unique is that we are
building our classes with students from
a very wide range of pre kindergarten
experiences.
Um student information that we gain
right now mainly from the surveys. Um
it's relevant to those pre kindergarten
settings and not necessarily to our
current classroom expectations.
We feel that getting real-time
information about students would be the
most beneficial and that oftentimes
within those first few days of school,
we as teachers can already see
adjustments that would be helpful in
student groupings. And we recognize that
um restructuring the beginning of the
year would be an adjustment for parents
and for students, but we're excited at
the thought of creating a strong sense
of community and to welcome kids into
their home school. So um what this could
look like um we have used the terms in
our discussions um camp kindergarten or
team kindergarten um to reflect that
students would be assigned a team at the
beginning of the year rather than a
classroom teacher for the first two days
and like camp student groupings would
change throughout the day depending on
the activity. So students could wear a
lanyard with their team color on it to
indicate their core group, but then have
additional markings to show other groups
that they would be a part of throughout
the day. Benefits of this would be that
the students get to meet and interact
with all of their kindergarten peers and
adults would be able to observe and
interact with all students as well to
gain as much information about how to
create those balanced classes.
Hi, I'm Christy Hopkins, kindergarten
teacher at Indian Trail. Um, during the
first couple days of kindergarten, our
primary focus is really teaching our new
kindergarters how to be a student within
the school community. Um, we want to
focus on routines, relationships,
building um, learner behaviors that help
our students feel safe and confident um,
ready to learn rather than conducting
some of those more academic or
skill-based um, assessments. So, this
structure um is designed to create a
predictable and welcoming start to the
school year for our kindergarters. And
by focusing on those relationships and
routines, we can really help students
build confidence and feel secure in this
new environment. So, after those first
two days of camp kindergarten, families
would receive communication, sharing
their child's um classroom teacher
assignment for the remainder of the
year. And this really again allows us
time to use um the information that we
have gotten from those two days um and
the experiences that we've had to
support balancing um classroom
communities. Um beginning on that third
day then students would get to join um
their assigned classroom teacher and
begin building their classroom
communities. This is where um individual
classroom routines, relationships um
learning expectations um would all be
started and um would hopefully support a
strong and successful school year.
Both um Marissa Sanderson and I are just
going to highlight some things from our
pre um prior camp kindergarten
experience. This was a while ago. This
was back in 2019. So what I would tell
you is when we successfully did this um
initiating that process really did
involve a lot of strong collaboration at
the building level. And just like with
anything new, communication was really
key to that. um and really took on a
couple different forms to make sure that
the parents and all of our families were
getting the information that they
needed. So, this included an initial
introduction letter about what the
program or camp kindergarten would look
like, what they could expect, what their
child could expect, and really the why
behind the process. So, making sure that
was very clearly communicated and some
time in between those different
communications. The other important
thing that um came to fruition with that
was um ensuring that our families and
parents had points of contact during
those first two days. We get a lot of
contact from um incoming kindergarten um
families. So, they didn't have that one
point of contact with the teacher, but
they did know who to contact and really
it made um really those communications
back and forth very fluid and included
both teachers. Our school team built a
system where we were really all hands on
deck for that unique experience those
first two days. that included our of
course our kindergarten teachers, our
specialists, our student support team
and really um that added to the success
of the um program just those first two
days allowing everybody to be involved
in this unique experience at Fairmont
and Whittier was similar. We only
fielded really about one to two um
additional phone calls from parents
about kind of just logistical questions.
It wasn't concerns by any means, but
just asking a couple more questions
about the process, which we obviously
were happy to do, but it wasn't a storm
or a large amount of parents um with
questions and really speaks to, I think,
the importance of that pre and proactive
communication being intact prior to
starting anything new. Marissa Sanderson
is going to kind of go into some really
detailed highlights. Um, but I would
just say from a global or building
level, uh, the program of camp
kindergarten was centered around kids
versus the class for those first two
days and really provided students with
an opportunity to learn about the school
as a collective unit and it was a fun
and supportive way to start the school
year for them.
Hi there. There's some benefits that I
would like to highlight for my
experience with camp kindergarten from
2019. So, first was a comprehensive
knowledge of all of the students that
came in. So, it really allowed for both
of the kindergarten teachers uh to
develop a shared understanding of the
child's the children in the grade level
and not just the students that were
assigned to your classroom. Um, and this
really included information um that was
really important such as their medical
needs and the allergies, learning
styles, social emotional needs, and
family dynamics. And at the same time,
the opposite was true where the students
got to become familiar with both of the
teachers, both of the classroom
environments. um and they just got a
great knowledge of both um classes. And
then after the placements were
finalized, students already felt a sense
of familiarity and safety across the
kindergarten wing. Um and it, you know,
helped to reduce some of that anxiety
with coming into kindergarten um at the
beginning of the school year. Next, it,
you know, there was a stronger
kindergarten community feel. It truly
fostered a grade level approach rather
than a my class versus your class model.
um we were able to get more eyes on the
students and we were able to see if
there were more needs quickly. Um and we
got to have extra staff in the
classrooms too. So the reading
specialists, the OT, speech pathologists
were able to push in early and observe
the students in their setting and begin
supporting right away. And this
collaborative approach really emphasized
that kindergarten is a shared
responsibility. Um and it helped to
build a cohesive supporting learning
community for the students from that
first day. Um, third was increased
flexibility and stronger instructional
collaboration. So, because both uh
teachers were able to work with all of
the students, instructional grouping
felt more natural and fluid. Um, while
collaborative grouping can happen
regardless, camp kindergarten made it
more effective because the students had
already been formally introduced to both
of the teachers, both of the classrooms,
and the shared routines. So, it just
created a stronger sense of teamwork and
made instructional decision-making more
informed and intentional. Um, I do want
to also provide some context about
kindergarten placement and articulation.
So, in most grade levels, teachers spend
a great deal of time at the end of the
school year articulating with the
following grade level and the grade the
teacher um sharing detailed information
about the students growths, their needs,
and some strategies that might have been
helpful for them in the previous year.
Um, and this process really allows um
that next teacher to get a valuable head
start and insight to the students needs
and successes. Um, and in kindergarten,
we just simply do not have that
opportunity. So, while a small number of
kids may come from the Grove Preschool,
a majority of the students that are
coming into our classroom are brand new
to us. Um, we've tried to bridge that
that gap through parent surveys that we
talked about um and outreach to the
preschools, but participation there
really, you know, it varies. Um, and as
a result, kindergarten teachers often
begin the year with very limited or no
information on any of the children that
are walking into the classroom. So, Camp
kindergarten helped to create a form of
articulation where one just naturally
does not exist. And even in a short time
frame, it allowed teachers to
collaborate, observe students, and begin
discussing support strategies and skill
development before the students were
permanently placed into a classroom.
This early insight helped us make more
informed decisions and allowed students
to begin their kindergarten experience
on a stronger footing. Um, I do also
want to acknowledge that camp
kindergarten did require additional
planning on the front end. So, my
teaching partner and I at that time had
met over the summer to kind of go
through and coordinate some of those
logistics and prepare intentionally. Um,
however, we felt that that upfront
investment resulted in a smoother, more
natural flow once the school year began
and it ultimately increased our ability
to be more proactive and less reactive
as the year continued.
Um, it really has been a topic of heavy
discussion within our grade level and my
colleagues have continued to advocate
for um, some form of camp kindergarten
and continually have brought up the idea
during our grade level meetings. Um
there seems to be a strong willingness
to invest that time early if it means
providing a more seamless supportive
transition for our youngest learners.
>> So from here you've heard the the shell
of some of the logistics. There's
obviously a lot more to build out but we
wanted to make sure that we are all kind
of in alignment with conceptually moving
forward on this so that we can begin to
build out further details. And really,
you heard about the importance of
communication that would begin at our
kindergarten roundups, which will begin
to occur next month. And so, that really
is kind of our target to be able to
launch these ideas. We've been in in
communication with the entire
kindergarten team, but we really want to
take some collaborative opportunities to
make sure that everyone is a part of
this. That helps to ensure the
consistency of experiences across the
district. And, you know, all of that
work, some of that pre-planning work
that Marissa was just talking about,
some of it can be done now. Some of it
obviously we can't do until we have
those that list of kids and all of that
information. And then our goal and our
recommendation would be to implement
both of these enhancements beginning
this fall with the recognition that just
as we do with all new things, there will
need to be time to reflect upon the
experience to gain feedback upon the
experience from families that have gone
through it and and really see you know
is this yielding the benefits that we
hope it will in you know knowing that
there is some impact. But I think one of
the things that is is important to
re-emphasize is that when we did do this
in two buildings, there there really
wasn't that um hesitation in the parent
community that we might have been
concerned about. We had a couple of
questions, but they were they were there
was there was not a strong parental
concern or familial concern that came
out and it ended up being a very
positive experience that people still do
remember and and occasionally talk
about. So that would be our our plan
going forward. So at this point I want
to open it up to board questions or any
discussion that you would like to have
around these ideas.
>> Thank you. Uh I'll open the floor.
Anybody have a want to start with a
question or kind of
>> Only question I had was I think it makes
sense. It's exciting for not only the
teachers. I think parents especially
I've got a little one that'll be coming
into the kindergarten shortly. I think
it makes a lot of sense. It would be
exciting to know that this will help
inform the decisions in their classroom.
Only question I had looking at it was
was two days determined to be enough and
we've got experience it sounds like with
the two days and and deem so but I just
wanted to gut check if if they could
have longer.
>> That's a great question and we actually
we actually did have a slightly longer
experience at Whittier one of those two
years where I I believe they went all
the way to 5 days. The feedback we got
was that that might have been a little
you we were we were ready to move
forward after two or three. And so I
think the the looking at next year's
calendar with the way it works with
Thursday, Friday, and then Monday kind
of being that, you know, that start
after the weekend. That's why we're
looking at a two-day model for next year
just because there's some natural
alignment there. But the consensus in
conversation from the limited number of
people who had experienced it was two or
three felt felt right sized.
>> Thank you.
I had a similar concern with that,
especially that um families would be
finding out that Friday. It it it seems
a lot to put on our kindergarten
teachers to survive those two days and
then put into writing and have the
families have it on a Friday, which then
they don't really have a point of
contact for the whole weekend. So, I
would just suggest maybe a little more
thought of uh could that Monday
help
I transition. We've had some of those
conversations, but I appreciate that
perspective. We will, like I said,
that's these are our next steps to kind
of finalize those things.
>> Would all of our schools be having this?
Do we have schools that would only have
one section of kindergarten that then
wouldn't I mean, they would have camp
kindergarten, but they'd already know
who their teacher was?
>> That's a great question. So, this year,
we don't have any schools that have a
single section of of kindergarten. So,
that but we don't we don't know that.
So, you're right. There could be some
uniqueness. The one other spot that will
be unique is the LCRA dual language
program. Like there is only one dual
language kindergarten teacher, but we
also have talked about how to
incorporate the some of those camp
kindergarten experiences for all of the
students even though some will know
where they're going where where they're
ultimately going to land prior to that.
So similar and I think you said exactly
what we would look at is if we were in a
one section situation, how would we
incorporate similar experiences knowing
that in the end there is one
kindergarten classroom.
>> You just made me think of the when you
brought up um the dual language in terms
of special program kindergarters, best
rise DLP. I'm assuming those students
would also be invited to attend their
with their with the regular education
kindergarten teachers, but would those
special programs teachers also be there?
Like how would that look for those kids
who might not be full time in the
regular ed kindergarten?
>> So, that's a great question and
obviously yes, we want to work to
balance some of those experiences, but
we also want to be cognizant of the
level of inclusion that's planned for
those kindergarten students in those
programs and make sure that we are
setting them up for success in the best
way that we can. So, you know, I think
yes, certainly we would want to join
those experiences where possible, but
also, you know, the establishment of of
some of the routines that some of those
students will benefit from based on
their individual plans may lead us to
some different ways of thinking about
that as we as we get to the final
preparations. Again, that'll be sort of
that as we're getting into the the true
lists of students, making some of those
determinations.
the other programs that were mentioned
that as like the traditional programs
such as the kindergarten roundup and the
leap into kindergarten, would those
still be in place and not affected at
all by this change?
>> Right. Absolutely. You know, the roundup
is is primarily a family information
night that would continue and be where
we'd communicate some of these things.
The leap into kindergarten program is
planned as part of our summer
experience. I think what what's what's
important to recognize in all of those
things is that it is very challenging if
not impossible to reach all students in
those across them you may actually touch
all the students but what we're trying
to accomplish is those moments where you
know at the beginning of the year when
we know all you know meet and greet is
definitely most if not all but then
those first two days are truly all and I
think that's the that's the difference
and that was really a big part of our
conversation with this working group was
that whatever we do we really want to
make sure that It is it is affect it is
touching all of the students who are
coming to us at the beginning of the
year.
>> One of the the big events that we know
is attended very well is kindergarten
roundup. And that's why we wanted to
have this conversation tonight before we
move forward because as Lisa shared,
communication is just so important with
this one. Um especially if if families
have a child entering kindergarten, but
they might have an older sibling. And if
you don't get that class notification in
kindergarten, we want to make sure that
families know about any potential
changes, especially at the roundup. And
of course, we'll communicate it a
hundred different ways. But we wanted to
make sure that we have that conversation
at the roundup so parents know um you
know over the summer that you wouldn't
be getting a kindergarten list uh and
your other children may.
>> Do those roundups typically happen
during the school day or after school?
>> They're all in the evening at school.
>> All in the evening. And do we provide a
virtual option for families or
recording?
>> We don't provide the the information
that is presented is available. We don't
we don't do it we don't do it virtually
live or anything like that and it's and
I and I don't believe we have a
recording at this point then during co
we did that but we have not but now now
it is more of a live event but all of
the information is it's it's sort of the
launch of a lot of information and then
it's all very easily discoverable and
then as Kevin mentioned pushed out in
several different ways as we go through
>> perhaps just an option if we are going
to go with camp kindergarten of having
some sort of
video versus a handout of what it should
look like. I think the team did a great
job of uh making it very student
centered and that it really is going to
be meeting the needs of students and
where they're at by matching them with a
classroom that's going to help them grow
as much. But I think it's translating
that into so families can understand how
student centered it really is. And it
seems like there's a good amount of
collaboration happening in these
kindergarten classrooms anyway because
then it becomes less of a who gotah who
they're getting the same experience
across 58 and they see that partnership
from the beginning is such a a powerful
instructional tool.
>> Absolutely.
>> Other questions or comments?
>> Quick question then for you. Um cuz we
had done this uh in some spots
previously.
Uh just knowing some of the history here
in Downer's Grove. uh
how have families and students handled
now they've got a taste of of the school
and they might start to get an opinion
on I want to be in this class or I made
a friend with this friend and you know
how is that handled
happening after they started the
experience where people might start to
form stronger opinions you know in that
process as opposed to getting that
notification understanding talking with
your student in advance and they're
coming into the room because there is
sort of a routine that families have of
going like, "Oh, we're going to check
and this is who you have and we're going
to introduce that person and there's
sort of like a, okay, I've now got my
momentum. I'm going to start to build a
relationship." How did that go in these
two years at one location and the one
year at the other location?
>> So, we we did not experience any of that
because again, those are things we've
all kind of anticipated. You know, what
happens when you get that comment or
question or concern on day three or
four? And we didn't we truly didn't have
that experience. So I I I can't tell you
it will never happen, but it it was not
part of that experience. And as we
reflected on, so why might that be?
There was definitely a lot of
conversation about the deliberate
efforts to make sure that every
everything was balanced during camp
kindergarten. So no one group spent more
time with teacher A than teacher B. That
the groupings were moving around during
the day. So the kids were interacting
with multiple other students instead of
sort of being in a core group
consistently. And so I think it was that
deliberate exposure to everything in a
really balanced format that helped to
make sure that those relationships were
growing across the board and and we you
know we kind of minimized the the risk
if you will of that that more focused
you know I am spending more time with
teacher A and therefore I'm going to
feel a certain way if I end up in
teacher B's classroom. So, a lot of
deliberate planning to make sure that
that's balanced. But, but honestly, that
again that is that is not we did not
experience that concern coming out of
the the initial experiences.
>> Perfect.
>> Look like you have a question.
>> No.
>> No. Okay. All right. Well, thank you.
>> Appreciate it.
>> Thank you to our kindergarten team.
>> Yeah. Thank you all for being here
tonight.
All right. Uh public comment time. This
is an opportunity for members of the
audience to share public comment with
the board, but is not intended to be a
time for members of the public to enter
into a dialogue with the board. Uh,
issues raised during public comment may
be addressed uh uh in by administrative
staff as appropriate or added to future
agenda items. The board has allowed 30
minutes for public comment this evening.
We ask you to keep it to a three-minute
limit. Give everyone an opportunity to
speak. Uh, do we have anything in the
basket? We do not have anything in the
basket. Is there anyone here wishing to
make public comment? If so, please step
up to the mic and state your name and
attendance area or your uh person of
employment.
All right, then we'll move on. Uh, next
up is going to be the approval of
minutes. Are there suggested revisions
to the minutes as presented in the
packet of materials?
All right. If not, is there a motion to
approve the minutes from the January
12th, 2026 regular meeting as presented?
>> So moved.
Second. Okay.
>> All those in favor? I. Any opposed? The
motion carried to approve the minutes of
the January 12th, 2026 regular meeting
as presented. Is there a motion to
approve the minutes of the January um
26, 2026 financial workshop as
presented?
>> Motion.
>> Second.
>> All right. Um all those in favor?
>> I. Any opposed? The motion carried to
approve the minutes of the January 26,
2026 financial workshop as presented. We
have a consent agenda tonight. Are there
any items a board member would like to
have considered separately?
All right. If not, is there a motion to
approve the consent agenda consisting of
the personnel report and the financial
statements consisting of the list of
bills and summary?
>> So moved.
>> Second.
>> All right. Thank you. Melissa, please
call roll.
>> Member Thomas. I
>> member Bernard.
>> I
>> member Doshi.
>> I
>> member Hannis.
>> I
>> member Olic.
>> I
>> member Hughes.
>> I The motion carried.
Uh consent agenda has been approved as
presented in the packet of materials.
And as part of this consent agenda, we
did uh the board has hired a new
principal for Whittier School. So I I
I'd like to hand it over to you, Dr.
Russell, to introduce him.
>> Thank you very much. This is always one
of the most exciting things I get to do
as superintendent. I want to thank so
many of the Whittier staff members who
are here tonight to welcome our new
principal. As you know, Whittier
principal Michael Krugman will retire at
the end of this school year after 15
years of dedicated service to our school
district and Whittier in particular. We
will miss his leadership and will also
um just miss his presence and and
everything he does for Whittier. We
certainly wish Michael and his family
the very best in a well-deserved
retirement. Because this was a planned
retirement, uh we began the principal
selection process early, which ensured a
strong pool of candidates and will allow
for a smooth transition. This process
included multiple interviews with
administrators and staff as well as
input from Whittier staff, support
personnel, families, and even a student
council focus group. That was a lot of
fun uh during the process that I got to
do that. From this collective feedback,
Mr. Brian Bolton emerged as the
strongest candidate and we were pleased
to recommend him for his appointment as
principal of your school in the
personnel agenda. Brian brings more than
13 years of experience in education. He
currently serves as the principal of
Fullerton Elementary School in Addison
school district 4. He's also served as
an assistant principal in both Itasa and
Lions school districts and a middle
school social studies teacher. He began
his career right here in district 58 as
a student teacher at Heric Middle
School. Mr. Bolton holds a master's
degree in educational leadership from
NIU and a bachelor's degree in secondary
education from Lewis University. Brian
also has strong ties to our community.
He attended Indian Trail Elementary and
O'Neal Middle School, graduated from
Downers Grove South High School, and
currently lives in Donner's Grove with
his wife and children who joined us this
evening. Nice to see you kids.
He is eager to give back to the
community that shaped him and to get to
know our students, families, and staff
in the greater or greater Whittier
School community. Please join me in
welcoming Mr. Brian Bolton to Whittier
School and as our new principal.
>> Well, thank you Board of Education and
uh District 58 community. Um this is a
bit of a surreal moment for me to to be
back here after all these years. Um for
a district that kind of gave me so much
and you know my daughters are are going
to be going through Kingsley. So it's
it's really exciting to be able to
contribute to um the Downers Grove
community in this way. Um you know I'm
really looking forward to working with
Mr. Krugman um the Whittier community
and uh the Whittier teachers and staff
um you know who are here you know today
and really hit the ground running to
ensure a smooth transition build on some
traditions and um you know really just
kind of uh transition into the future.
So um you know again my sincerest
gratitude uh thank you for you know
giving me this shot and I won't let you
down. So thank you.
>> Thank you. Congratulations.
All right, we have a couple items up for
action tonight. First up is the uh 2026
2027 school fees. Is there a motion to
approve the school fees for the 2627
school year as presented?
>> So moved.
>> Second.
>> All right. Any discussion?
All right, let's please call roll.
>> Memberic.
>> I.
>> Member Thomas.
>> I.
>> Member Bernard.
>> Hi.
>> Member Doshi.
>> Hi.
>> Member Hannis.
>> Hi. Member Hughes.
>> I. The motion carried to approve the uh
the school fees for the 2627 school year
as presented. Next up, we have a
resolution for the dismissal of
custodial maintenance employee for
reasons other than reduction in force.
Is there a motion to adopt the
resolution for the removal uh uh I'm
sorry, for the dismissal of custodial
maintenance employee for reasons other
than reducing force.
>> So moved.
>> Second.
>> All right. Um
close.
>> What's the please go row?
>> Memberic.
>> Hi.
>> Member Thomas.
>> I.
>> Member Bernard.
>> Hi.
>> Member Doshi.
>> Hi.
>> Member Hannis.
>> Hi.
>> Member Hughes.
>> I. The motion carried to adopt the
resolution for the removal, I'm sorry,
for the dismissal of custodial
maintenance employee for reasons other
than a reduction in force. I have a
construction consent agenda tonight. Are
there any items a board member would
like to have considered separately? All
right. If not, is there a motion to
approve the construction consent agenda
consisting of elementary school kitchen
equipment purchase?
>> Motion.
>> Second.
>> Thank you. Melissa, please call roll.
>> Member Bernard.
>> Hi.
>> Member Doshi.
>> Hi.
>> Member Hannis.
>> Hi.
>> Member Olick.
>> Hi.
>> Member Thomas.
>> I.
>> Member Hughes.
>> I. The motion carried. The consent
agenda has been approved as presented in
the packet of materials. I have a couple
of announcements. Uh, Friday, February
the 20th at 7:00 a.m. will be our
legislative breakfast and then Monday,
February 23rd at 7 p.m. that will be the
curriculum workshop and that'll be right
back here at the Downers Grove Civic
Center. The board will now meet in close
session. Is there a motion to move to
close uh to discuss the appointment,
employment, compensation, discipline,
performance or dismissal of a specific
employee of the district? It's 5 ILCS
120 to C1 and uh the collective on
negotiating matters between the public
body and its employees or the
representatives or deliberations
concerning salary schedules for one or
more classes of employees. That's five
LCS122C2
and for the discussion of minutes of
meetings lawfully closed under the open
meetings act whether for the purpose uh
or the approval of the body of minutes
or the semiannual review of the minutes
is mandated by section 2.06 06 5CS 120
that's 2C21.
>> So move
>> second.
>> All right. Any discussion on that? All
right. Melissa, please call roll.
>> Member Johi.
>> Hi.
>> Member Hannis.
>> I.
>> Member Olic.
>> Hi.
>> Member Thomas.
>> I.
>> Member Bernard.
>> I.
>> Member Hughes.
>> I. The motion carried. The board will
now move into closed session after a
short recess. It's 8:24. Let's try to be
in there. Give it four minutes. 828.
**Hughes:** All right. Good evening, everyone. This is the regular meeting of the Downers Grove School District 58 Board of Education, here on Monday, February the 9th, 2026, at 7 p.m. here at the Downers Grove Civic Center. This meeting is being live-streamed for the public on the Village of Downers Grove's YouTube channel. Melissa, will you please call roll?
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Bernard.
**Bernard:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Doshi.
**Doshi:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Ellis is absent. Member Hanus.
**Hanus:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Olczyk.
**Olczyk:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Thomas.
**Thomas:** Here.
**Secretary Jerves:** Member Hughes.
**Hughes:** Here.
Just as a quick note for everyone, later on in the agenda, we had a spotlight on our education foundation that has actually been postponed until April because the presenter is out sick today. So if anybody was here for that, just wanted to give you a heads up.
Another quick announcement: tonight, members of the audience will have an opportunity to provide public comment later on in the agenda. The board asks anyone wishing to comment to please fill out a card — they're over there by the main door. Fill out that card, indicate the topic to be addressed, and then place it in that basket. I have allotted 30 minutes tonight for public comment.
All right, we're going to go ahead and start as we always do with the Pledge of Allegiance. I'd like to welcome up the student council members from Henry Puffer School to lead us.
**Student:** I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
**Hughes:** Thank you so much. Now I'd like to welcome up the principal of Henry Puffer School, Principal Leapart.
**Principal Leapart:** Good evening, everyone. It's an honor for Henry Puffer to shine a spotlight on all the wonderful things going on in our school today. We are going to have some of our student council reps talk to you, as well as our PTA presidents, and then I'll share a few of our spotlights and some of the data that we've been working through this year. First up is Brooke Vogt.
**Student (Medina Abbas):** Good evening. My name is Medina Abbas. I'm one of the fifth grade student council representatives. This year, the student council board has several goals to make sure that we all have a fun and successful year. Our main goal was to take as many opinions from the student body as possible and not just come up with these ideas ourselves.
One of the most important goals was to spread kindness throughout the school. We did this through a kindness-themed spirit week and a kindness club. Everyone is working hard to spread kindness throughout the school and all the grades. Our most powerful goal was to have a fundraiser for many different organizations. One of the organizations that we helped was the FISH Food Pantry in Downers Grove. We did this to help families in Downers Grove and nearby areas with food and supplies.
Last but not least, our final goal was to have better communication with PTA members. We were able to build a relationship with PTA members by asking our student council teacher sponsors to communicate to the PTA for student council, as we donated to their event which helped many Puffer families. Next, you will hear from my fellow council member Brooke Vogt, who will discuss our exciting spirit week themes at Henry Puffer.
**Student (Brooke Vogt):** Hi. This year, student council has done many fun spirit days at our school. Some examples of these spirit days are Red Ribbon Week, Holiday Spirit Week, and PJ Day. These spirit days help students show school spirit and have fun together. Some spirit days are also fundraisers that help support school activities. We ask students to participate and enjoy dressing up with their classmates. Spirit days are a win-win because students have fun and help the school at the same time. With student council this year, we hope to make school more exciting and create even more fun spirit days.
**Student (Carson Sandage):** Hi. My name is Carson Sandage. I'm on Henry Puffer Student Council. We have done a number of fundraisers so far this year. In December, we held a food drive for FISH Food Pantry. If you donated food, you could get raffle tickets to try to win a giant bear. In total, we collected and donated 835 pounds of food to help people in our community. We also set up a school shop to raise money and build school spirit. The Henry Puffer Student Council is excited to support our school community and the Downers Grove community.
**Student (Elena Collive):** Hi, my name is Elena Collive, and I am one of the fifth grade student council representatives. Henry Puffer loves to help. We help by spreading kindness, handing out blue tickets, hosting school spirit days, and running our school store.
Henry Puffer uses a system of blue tickets. Every time a kid makes a good choice — like finishing their homework or helping a peer — a teacher might spot them and give them a blue ticket. Then at school assemblies, our principal, Mr. Leapart, picks one from all the collected tickets, and whoever that ticket belongs to gets a prize. This is our way of encouraging good choices.
We have also set up our school store. Every other Wednesday, our representatives go to each grade level and kids can buy pencils, erasers, or pens. Fun school supplies make learning even more fun. And these are just some of the ways our student council helps Henry Puffer.
Next up are our PTA presidents, Jackie Olitz and Carrie McTagart.
**PTA President (Jackie Olitz):** Hi, thank you for having us. That is a really tough act to follow — very impressive work by our student council. My name is Jackie Olitz.
**PTA President (Carrie McTagart):** I'm Carrie McTagart. We are in our second year as PTA co-presidents at Henry Puffer with the Puffer Hefty PTA.
I want to highlight the rest of our board for a couple of reasons. One, we have a treasurer, Dan Hint, who's now in his unprecedented second term. I don't know if anybody knows, but it's not often you see somebody raise their hand to go another two years, so a shoutout to Dan. We're also really impressed with our PTA in the sense that our dads are very active in our PTA and with all of our events, so we want to make sure we gave a spotlight to that. Emily Middle serves as our vice president and is in her first year, and Sheila Brigette serves as our secretary and is also in her second year.
So with that, we're going to talk a little bit about the ways that we connect and support our Puffer community. First, this year we did our second Halloween Bingo, but this year our chairs took it to another level and made it a zero-waste event — there was absolutely no waste generated by this event held on site at the school, which was really extraordinary. It was a great opportunity to show the kids that we can continue to do fun things without generating a lot of waste. We also do a long run to honor Gene Pogue, but this year we added color to the run, which was really exciting for the kids. They had a choice at the end of the run whether they wanted to run through the color stations, in case that was overstimulating for them — an exciting new addition.
And then this year, Carrie orchestrated a poinsettia fundraiser, which was new and fun. It was a really nice way at our waffle breakfast for families to pick up their poinsettias and have those as gifts for their families as well.
We continue to do a monthly newsletter. This was new. One of the things that PTAs really struggle with is the fact that all different generations want to communicate differently — there's email, there's ParentSquare, there's Facebook pages. We are in our second year of offering a monthly newsletter for our families, in addition to Mr. Leapart's Puffer Post, so that we can continue to communicate all the things that are happening for our staff, students, and teachers.
And then kinder and new family outreach — this is one of the things that Carrie and I are really proud of. Every year we call every single new kindergarten family to try and touch base with them and welcome them into Puffer. We also do that for all new families regardless of grade coming into our school. We want them to know who we are, know who the PTA is, and feel like they have someone they can reach out to if they have questions, versus feeling like contacting the school is scary. Things like: what does the ice cream social look like, and what is the dungeon — if anybody doesn't know what that is at Puffer.
**Carrie McTagart:** Supporting our school and staff — these are just a list of things that the PTA brings to bear within Henry Puffer. A couple of things I do want to highlight that are sort of in addition to what you would probably hear from most parent-teacher organizations.
We do a staff holiday gift drive. We want to make sure that not just our teachers — who feel the love from their students every holiday season — but also any staff member and/or teacher that doesn't have their own classroom has a holiday gift from the PTA as well.
Enrichment requests: we take our largest fundraiser of the year and figure out how much overflow we have after covering all of our events and items, and then we give it back to the teachers as an opportunity to ask for enrichments for their classroom or things that serve the school as a whole — things like wobble stools in different classrooms, if that's something a teacher has extra need for. The PTA does what we can to make sure we can provide that at the end of each school year.
The other thing that is new this year — usually students can order school supply boxes, and the PTA usually provides a box for each of the teachers as well for extra supplies. What we've realized is there are like 25 pink erasers that the teachers don't need anymore. So we are doing something new this year: in January, we collected requests for what items teachers are actually missing.
**Jackie Olitz:** Mostly Kleenex.
**Carrie McTagart:** Mostly Kleenex and Expo markers. And then the money that we would have spent on the pre-packed boxes, we're using that to actually buy the supplies that teachers need to help in the classroom for the second half of the year. First year we're doing this — I think it's going to be perfect. We're really excited.
Again, another long list of things that we do just to support our students across the school. One of the things I'll say about our PTA and our parent and caregiver community as a whole: we do everything in our power to be able to say yes to every request that comes from our school. We know that we have varying degrees of resources, exposure, and access across our community, and so the PTA takes it very much to heart to make the experience as equitable as possible for all of the students that come into Puffer.
The class t-shirts are fun — Carrie made a huge effort to bring those back. The PTA supports each class having their own color and every student having a t-shirt. These are great for our teachers on field trips because they can spot their students, and they've also been a really fun way for each class to represent themselves during school assemblies. It's kind of a rainbow of colors across the gym, which is really fun.
This is again just a list of things showcasing a lot of the fun that we have and more ways that we're supporting our families and community. I talked a little bit about Halloween Bingo and it being zero-waste. The other thing I would highlight: we do a holiday breakfast every year — it's usually a pancakes-and-pajamas type of deal. This year, our extraordinary parents took on making waffles, which we thought was crazy, but they did it without a hitch and it was awesome and people loved it.
Both of those events are self-funded, and we are able to take all of the overage from ticket sales and donations and give that money back to community members. For folks that need a little additional support, we purchase gift cards with that overage and those are given out over the holiday season to families in our community.
**Jackie Olitz:** Anything else?
**Carrie McTagart:** That's the biggest one.
**Jackie Olitz:** Okay, that's it.
So just to talk a little bit about our Panther Pride — if you weren't getting that from us yet, then we haven't done our job.
**Carrie McTagart:** Oh, this is you.
**Jackie Olitz:** Oh — I edited this, so I apologize.
**Carrie McTagart:** I think I know where to start. I'll steal your thunder. Thank you for having us. We appreciate it.
**Jackie Olitz:** Just for context, the dungeon is not where we send misbehaving students — it's storage in the basement.
**Principal Leapart:** At Henry Puffer, our work truly starts and ends with people — our students, teachers, families, and community. Our Henry Puffer families come together once a month, providing students with meaningful opportunities to build relationships with Puffer Panthers across all grade levels. Students remain in the same Puffer family with the same staff member from the time they join us in kindergarten until the time they leave us in fifth or sixth grade, fostering strong connections and a deep sense of belonging.
Our school environment is rooted in being respectful, responsible, and safe, and we intentionally cultivate a positive school culture grounded in the tenets of the Happiness Advantage. Our strong partnership with families is reflected in our collaboration with our amazing PTA and in initiatives such as Watchdogs and Puffer Reunions.
We're excited to welcome our Watchdogs fathers and father figures each Wednesday as they spend half the day supporting classrooms and making lasting memories with their children. We also host reunions for former Puffer students who return to visit their old stomping grounds — we even had someone come from as far as Hawaii this year.
This year we were thrilled to partner with Lyman Woods to create the Henry Puffer Garden on the southwest corner of our building, connecting with our already-established Hannah's Garden. This special project included Mr. Maywin, one of our Puffer parents and a Lyman Woods member, who taught students about native plants and worked alongside students and parent volunteers to bring the garden to life. We're hoping this will be an outdoor space our school and community will enjoy for years to come.
Students also thrive through a wide variety of clubs and activities, including running club, podcasting club, photography, kindness club, student council, and our fifth and sixth grade buddies. Together, these opportunities create a vibrant, inclusive environment where students feel connected, supported, and empowered to grow.
Our guiding beliefs center on the idea that all students can learn and thrive when our work is intentional, focused, and aligned. We use a funnel approach in which district goals inform our building priorities, those priorities guide our classroom practice, and instruction ultimately impacts each individual student. This alignment ensures coherence and clarity across all levels of work.
We believe that what we look for is what we find, which reinforces the importance of directing our energy toward strengths, effective practices, and factors within our control. When we intentionally seek out positives, we're better positioned to build upon them, just as overemphasis on negatives can limit growth.
Data plays a critical role in informing instruction and guiding decision-making, allowing us to adjust practices in ways that enhance student learning through cycles of inquiry. We focus our collective efforts on instructional strategies that yield the greatest impact, supporting continuous improvement in literacy, math, and school culture and climate.
Our first goal addresses an identified area of need based on the ECRA and NWEA MAP data and supports overall literacy development while aligning with the Illinois Comprehensive Literacy Plan. Teachers use student work, assessment data, and teacher estimates of instruction from John Hattie to plan targeted instruction aligned to Benchmark Advance, with an emphasis on intentional small-group instruction. Resources such as Scholastic News and Scope are incorporated across grade levels to provide regular practice with informational texts. Progress is monitored through assessment reviews, PLC+ data discussions, and instructional planning, with effectiveness measured using our ECRA propensity model, MAP results, and ongoing feedback from our instructional coaches.
Our second goal focuses on developing deep mathematical thinking, reasoning, and transferable skills through the intentional use of backwards design and deliberate practice. Teachers have integrated problem-solving opportunities into daily instruction, utilizing Forefront MAP and ECRA data to monitor progress and adjust lessons, and collaborate with grade-level teams to ensure alignment with all standards. Our instructional coaches have supported planning, data analysis, and modeling of effective strategies. Progress is monitored through student growth in the ECRA and MAP assessments as well as benchmark testing, Forefront reporting, and team data discussions, with ongoing accountability provided through unit meetings, team planning, and coaching feedback.
Our third goal has focused on strengthening trust and instructional leadership to support a positive school culture. Efforts have included structured ILT collaboration to build collective teacher efficacy, staff and committee meetings that provide opportunities for feedback and shared decision-making, and professional learning sessions that incorporate teacher input into instructional planning. Classroom rotations during our staff meetings have highlighted teacher-led strategies, successes, and innovations. Progress has been monitored through ongoing check-in surveys, ensuring continuous growth in school culture and climate.
Our winter MAP results show some pretty strong progress for our students. In math, students achieved in the 82nd percentile nationally in the winter — that's an increase up from the 65th percentile in the fall. In reading, our students scored in the 78th percentile nationally, up from the 64th percentile in the fall. Student growth was also quite impressive, with math growth in the 84th percentile nationally and reading growth in the 74th percentile.
Our winter ECRA data provides another snapshot of our student performance and shows meaningful improvement from where we began in the fall. ECRA offers a different perspective than MAP, as its calculations are based on where students finished in the previous spring and do not include students in grades 1 through 6 who were new to us this year. Overall, 74% of our students met benchmark, representing a 6% increase from fall, and 86% demonstrated high or expected growth, an increase of 9%. The overall growth effect size improved to -0.01, which was a 0.13 gain from the fall — pretty significant.
In math, 70% of our students met their benchmark, which was up 7%, with 85% of our students showing high or expected growth — an increase of 13% — and the growth effect size improving to -0.05, which is a gain of 0.37.
In reading, 79% of our students met benchmark, which was an increase of 6%, and 89% demonstrated high or expected growth, which is up 4%, with a growth effect size of +0.03, which is slightly lower than it was in the fall.
As far as grade levels are concerned, our winter growth data for Henry Puffer shows generally strong performance across grade-level cohorts with clear areas for some targeted support in math. Kindergarten, second, third, and fourth grade cohorts demonstrated positive growth effect sizes, with our third grade cohort showing particularly strong growth. The kindergarten and first grade cohorts had high percentages of students meeting benchmark, though first grade growth was notably lower — likely influenced by this cohort having finished last year in the 99th percentile.
In the upper grade-level cohorts, fifth and sixth grades had fewer students meeting benchmark, but most demonstrated expected growth, highlighting steady progress alongside opportunities for closing achievement gaps.
In reading, the kindergarten, second, third, and fifth grade cohorts posted positive growth effect sizes. The first and fourth grade cohorts had solid benchmark attainment but slightly negative growth, indicating progress closer to expected levels rather than accelerated. The sixth grade cohort demonstrated expected growth for most students, though the growth effect size was slightly negative, suggesting a need for some targeted support to strengthen progress. Overall, the data shows strong foundational performance across the school with opportunities to improve and accelerate learning, particularly in first, fourth, fifth, and sixth grade cohorts.
One area that we continue to closely monitor is the growth of our subgroups. Winter growth data for Henry Puffer shows that all student subgroups achieved growth within the expected range, with some groups demonstrating particularly strong progress. In math, our English learners, Asian students, and other student groups showed positive growth effect sizes, while Black, Hispanic, IEP, and low-income students had slightly lower growth but still within the expected range. Gender differences were minimal, with male students showing slightly higher growth than females.
In reading, our ELs, Asian, and other student groups posted positive growth, while Black, Hispanic, IEP, and low-income students had slightly negative growth effect sizes — again, all within the expected range. Overall, subgroup data highlights steady progress across our school while identifying opportunities to accelerate learning for specific groups to further close those achievement gaps.
One of the metrics our team tracks is the percentage of students performing in the average quintile and above on MAP over time. This provides a snapshot of student achievement growth over the past three and a half years. We typically see the largest gains from fall to winter with slight regression from winter to spring, and more pronounced regression from spring to fall, reflecting both summer slide and the impact of our more transient student population. Despite this, the overall trend line in both math and reading remains positive.
Currently, 92.5% of our students are performing in the average quintile and above in math, and about 88% are in the average quintile and above in reading — an increase of 7% in math and 4.5% in reading from last winter.
I won't continue on with any more numbers, but I do thank you for the time and the opportunity to shine a spotlight on Henry Puffer School.
**Hughes:** Thank you so much. For all our student council members, we do have some gifts for you. Thank you for being here tonight.
All right. Listed on tonight's agenda are 20 communications received by the board. Are there any additional communications a board member would like to share at this time?
That brings us to our next item. We're going to start off tonight with our 10-year health life safety review with Kevin Bart.
**Presenter (Nishi Sha, Whiten Company):** Hello. I'm Nishi Sha with Whiten Company. I'm an architect and project manager. I've been working on all of your referendum projects for the schools.
Every 10 years, the Illinois State Board of Education requires the district to have a licensed architectural professional walk all of your buildings to make sure they're in compliance with applicable building codes. Each building is on a 10-year cycle. The majority of your buildings —
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah, Whiten Company]**
Hello. I'm Nishi Shah with Whiten Company. I'm an architect and project manager. I've been working on all of your referendum projects for the schools.
Every 10 years, the Illinois State Board of Education requires the district to have a licensed architectural professional walk all your buildings to make sure they're in compliance with applicable building codes. Each building is on a 10-year cycle. The majority of your buildings are on 10-year cycles from 2015 to 2025, with the exception of Henry Puffer, as you acquired that separately. That one is on a 2023 cycle, so Henry Puffer was done two years ago and we completed that at that time.
We currently have the remaining schools that we need to complete for the 10-year life safety review. Because we have all the construction projects from the referendum, we have scheduled these to happen after all those projects are done, so you're having minimal violation items. At this round we are looking at nine buildings: your two middle schools, which were completed this December, and seven elementary schools from the phase one and phase two work — Hillcrest, Highland, Whittier, Fairmount, Kingsley, Lester, and —
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Indian Trail.
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
Indian Trail. Thank you. I was like —
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
That was still pretty impressive.
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
The remaining schools — the three elementary schools — we will be looking at in the fall of this year after their summer projects are completed. So Baer, Elsie, and Pierce Town will be looked at after those are completed.
We're required to complete four documents. The first is existing building conditions. We have to write narratives about what your building systems are now and what codes apply. We have to provide updated floor plans showing life safety data — meaning the rating of the walls, the mechanical system, and where your smoke detectors are. The main part of it is that we have to document violations. We walk your buildings, check them against the code in effect when they were built, and verify that everything is in compliance.
We walked the buildings for these first nine after construction was done — either in the fall of this year or this past January — and we had the preliminary findings, which we walked through with Kevin Bartau and Greg Harris a week or so ago.
In terms of process and methodology: we have done a lot of your projects already, so we have a really good picture of your buildings. They are in really good shape with a minimal number of violations. There are three different categories for violations.
The first is **urgent** — an immediate hazard to life or safety of the students. These must be addressed within one year. ISBE tells you that you need to address these items within a year. This can be something structural, something related to exiting, or fire detection — making sure all your smoke detectors are working — so that in the event of some type of incident, students can exit safely.
The second is **required** — these must be addressed within five years. Examples include electrical outlets near water that need GFCI protection.
The third is **recommended**, which is within 10 years. These are not required, but you can add them. They are typically accessibility items — sidewalks, playgrounds — things that may have a tripping hazard or similar condition.
Generally, your buildings are in really good shape. The middle schools, because they had comprehensive updates during the referendum projects, have no violations — we really touched every part of those buildings and everything is in compliance. Your remaining elementary schools had some minimal items.
We have about $50,000 in urgent items. These might be a penetration in a wall that needs to be sealed or a door that needs to swing a different direction. Most of these were in areas that we did not touch during the referendum projects. In addition to that, you have about $23,000 in five-year required items. This might be outlets in classrooms that are near sinks — you have a lot of sinks in your elementary school classrooms, and there are probably outlets that have been there for 50 years that need to be updated with proper safety protection.
The recommended category contains the majority of items. These are not required, but include things like Whittier paving — we know there are a lot of bumps in that asphalt — or areas where you might have certain glass that, if broken, would need to be replaced. Those are all 10-year recommended items.
So to summarize: these seven elementary schools have the items I described. The two middle schools had no violations. We will be completing the remainder in the fall. I'll see you here about a year from now.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Questions or comments? We were going to ask the same question.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
I'm assuming yes, but I wanted to ask — did we review those urgent and required items and identify any that were in the scope of enhancements over the past two to three years of projects where we would have expected our contractors to be accountable?
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
When we walked those buildings, we did ask whether each item was something that was part of the referendum and should have been taken care of versus whether it was a separate item. So we did discern those items.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
So everything on this list is not within that bucket, and those items were handled by the contractors?
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
Correct.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
I was going to ask if we can get the list.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Yes, I believe that was on the agenda.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
I think it was on the agenda earlier, but now all we see is the presentation. The individual reports were there this morning.
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
They were — let me check. Right now they are drafts. We'll have to upload them to ISBE once you approve, and it is a draft version currently.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Is it — click the link?
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Is it the survey?
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
This should be the violations.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
It's done by individual school, then.
**[ARCHITECT - Nishi Shah]**
Yes, it is.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
If you click the link that says "survey."
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Okay, sorry — I didn't know what the main files were. Yeah, it looks like the top has it.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Nice. And then it takes you to the drive, and they're all in there.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
I see. Thank you.
**[Dr. Russell / Staff]**
And if any board member wants more specifics on anything you see in the list, Kevin Bartau and Nishi can get that to you in an update.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Any other comments or questions? We appreciate your time. Thank you very much.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Thank you, Nishi.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
All right. As I said earlier, we're going to be skipping the Education Foundation presentation tonight — that has been moved to April. That brings us to the reports of the board. We'll start with the superintendent report. Dr. Russell.
---
**[Dr. Russell — Superintendent Report]**
Thank you. For my report tonight, I'll start with personnel. Tonight's personnel report is more of a preview. At our March meeting, there will be two topics discussed. First, Justin will share a high-level preview of staffing planning for next school year and an update on where we are in that process. Additionally, we will discuss the 2027–28 calendar, with the hope of approving that calendar at the April meeting. We're looking forward to more complete alignment with District 99's calendar because construction will no longer impact our start and end dates. As a reminder, the 2026–27 calendar has already been approved and is up on our website for anyone to view.
In terms of curriculum and instruction, this past weekend the band and orchestra solo fest was held and it was a huge success. More than 495 solos and ensembles were performed at this event — I had to do a double take when I read that number. We have a very robust performing arts program here in our district and they did a great job. We want to thank our instrumental music department for all their hard work planning and preparing, and thank our parent volunteers who helped keep the day running. As you can imagine, when you have almost 500 students performing, it requires a lot of volunteers and we are really grateful for everyone. It was a wonderful event.
Speaking of wonderful events, we're looking forward to the District 58 Festival of Music, which will take place next week on February 19th at Downers Grove South. We alternate between the two high school venues. This is always a fun event when O'Brien and Herrick combine their bands, orchestras, and choirs, so you don't want to miss that one if you're available that evening.
On February 23rd, we will also hold our curriculum workshop here. At the workshop, we'll share the winter data snapshot as well as updates on the middle school MAP pilot and the work of many of our district committees. We'll also have a discussion about athletics and activities for next school year at the middle schools.
Finance will be covered by Dr. Harris in his CSBO report, so we'll skip that here.
For technology: this past Friday, District 58 sent benchmark assessment reports home via ParentSquare using its secure document delivery system. Sending reports home digitally is more secure, efficient, and cost-effective than printing reports for all students. For security reasons, these reports are not sent as attachments — instead, parents are required to sign into their ParentSquare account to view them. The nice thing about that is that once you do, they are always there and accessible. We appreciate that feature in ParentSquare, and it is one of the new advantages of our new system.
For special services: District 58 looks forward to offering extended school year programming to eligible students with disabilities. Students who qualify for ESY through their IEP will receive a direct invitation and more information from their child's case manager. Dates for the program will be June 12th through July 14th. That sounds like a long way away, but it will come very quickly — as today's hundredth day of school, which our kindergarten teachers demonstrated, reminds us. It is a little later this year because of our late start, but we are getting closer and closer to the end of the school year.
For public relations: just a reminder about our legislative breakfast, which was postponed due to the extreme cold day. District 58 will host its annual legislative breakfast — really more of a forum than a formal breakfast — on Friday, February 20th at 7 a.m. at Herrick Middle School. Several state legislators are expected to attend. The event provides an opportunity to engage in discussion around key issues impacting District 58 and the broader school community. I want to thank our legislative committee for their hard work organizing this forum every year. It's always a good event and it's nice to speak with our legislators.
We have also sent out both of our annual surveys — the District 58 climate survey and the Five Essentials survey. We encourage families to take both. The Five Essentials survey is also available to all staff, and students in grades four through eight will take it as well. So those are coming up. That concludes my report.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Fantastic. Any questions or comments on the superintendent report? All right. That brings us to our monthly business and treasurer's report. Dr. Harris.
---
**[Dr. Harris — CSBO Report]**
Good evening, members of the board. Tonight I will be speaking on just two topics. The first is the year-to-date report and the treasurer's report, which is included in your packet.
I'd like to offer a little analysis on the year-to-date report. On the revenue side, some things drawing my attention: I think we're running a bit low on our state special education funding. We think we're going to be off there a little bit — that has to do with proration hitting us a bit more deeply than we anticipated. But there are bright spots as well. One is interest revenue, and some of the big ones we count on — EAV, property taxes — are all running really well. Our local revenue in the other column is also a bright spot.
So there are some places where we're off to the negative and some where we're off to the good, and it kind of balances out. On the expenditure side, I'm looking very closely at salaries and benefits since those are our biggest costs. I think we're a little bit under on salaries and a little bit over on benefits, especially in the educational fund. But since the salaries number is much larger than the benefits number, I'd much rather be favorably off on salaries than unfavorably off. I'm pleased with that and I don't think there's anything to be concerned about.
I'll pause and see if any board members have any questions on the monthly reports.
**[No questions.]**
The other item is just an FYI for the board of education and the community. Very soon the district will be putting out our request for proposals for our food service program. We are acknowledging that the board has a new vision for what that program should look like — specifically, hot meals for all students, K through 8. Previously that had only been available at the middle schools. We currently have two vendors handling our middle school program and our elementary program separately. We are going to be looking for one vendor to handle everything. Since the scope of the project has changed, we are going out for an RFP.
You will also see in tonight's construction consent agenda the realization of this vision from the board of education, as we are purchasing a lot of equipment for our kitchens thanks to a grant provided by Representative Anstafa. This is just an FYI — there's no news yet, just that we are in the process of moving forward. We expect to bring a recommendation to the board at the May or June meeting at the latest. Any questions?
**[No questions.]**
---
**[Dr. Russell]**
We are very excited to receive this kitchen grant from Representative Saba. Like our playgrounds, this is a huge help. We had always planned to use the interest money from the referendum for kitchen equipment — that was something we discussed after the referendum — but this grant really does help us and almost erases the entire cost of putting the kitchen equipment in.
As a reminder for the board, last summer we were able to complete the kitchen work for the phase two schools. This summer we'll be doing the kitchen work at the phase one and phase three elementary schools. Some schools are a bit easier to work with — Henry Puffer is a good example because they used to have a food service program when it was its own district. Other schools are more challenging. When you think about a school like Highland or Lester, the kitchen area is that small room off the gym, and there are building code requirements that we have to squeeze in there. I want to thank our architects for getting very creative with that.
This is something we have been hearing about for a long time. I know the board has heard about it, and I've certainly heard about it since I've been superintendent here. We are one of the only remaining districts in the area that does not offer a food service program for our elementary students. With so many of our families having two working parents, this is a really good thing for our families. It's also a really nice thing for any student who qualifies for free and reduced lunch, so that they're able to get a consistent meal day in and day out at our schools.
We're very happy to move this forward. Next year will certainly be a learning year — when you haven't done something in over 100 years and then implement it, I'm sure there will be some bumps in the road. But with the new middle school kitchens, we're very excited about the plan and the rollout.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Fantastic. Questions or comments? Appreciate it. Thank you. All right, onto our committees.
The policy committee has not met since the last board meeting. Neither has the legislative committee. The financial advisory committee has met. You heard a little about that in the report — we went over the year-to-date report, things in general were looking good, and we talked about the food service RFP.
The only thing I'd add is that, as Dr. Russell was alluding to, we have very small kitchens in our grade schools. So it will be a hub-and-spoke model. The dividing line will be the train tracks — each middle school will be the starting point for food preparation, and the elementary schools will have more of a warmer-and-finisher setup.
A big part of that bid is also going to keep the grade schools, at least in the opening bid, on a pre-order model. Students pre-order for the week from a menu. That helps us keep down food waste and makes sure kids actually get the meal they were looking for rather than something running out in the process.
The RFP is included in tonight's packet. This is the first phase, which will go out to bid, and we're looking forward to getting one vendor to handle this whole piece. If you remember, Quest at the time could not deliver to the grade schools at a price that made sense. They were willing to hold back, and they even shared their ordering system to help us bridge this gap. Now we can't make a major change without going back out to RFP, so this is required for us even apart from the timing. We had done a one-year contract and then extended it with Quest.
The other big topic we discussed was policies. There are really two significant policies that previously came out of the financial advisory committee: our fund balance policy and our capital policy.
Now that we're coming out of a referendum, we're looking at making some adjustments and tying those policies to our long-term needs — specifically looking out five years and making sure we're funding things appropriately. We're looking at starting off at about $750,000 in capital reserves. We've been reviewing the language around that, making sure we're within the boundaries of what is required by law and what we're actually going to need. As you may know, our DSAB bonding ability is going to need to be used for other purposes, so we need to make sure we have the ability to maintain things. A good frame of reference — and one of the reasons why $750,000 stands out — is that it's about half a roof per year in savings. Roofs are one of our more expensive recurring needs.
The other policy is our fund balance policy. We're looking at reframing that as we've dialed everything into a purely cash basis rather than toggling back and forth between accrual and cash. Part of it is: what can we cover now, and what do we need to cover? Right now we still have our arbitrage dollars, so we're in a position where we need to set ourselves up to reach that minimum number in a year or two. What should that exactly look like, and how should we define it? We're looking at a blend — the overall percentage to expenses as well as the number of days cash on hand — because of the way we get funded at the beginning and end of our fiscal year. If we can show on a graph where our low cash points fall, it's easy to see whether we're capable of covering our expenses throughout the year.
We're going to be getting some language together over the next couple of meetings and will bring it forward before the end of the school year. We think the new language will not only cover what we need to do but set us up to be successful.
Steve, did I miss anything?
**[Dr. Harris]**
No, you got it covered.
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Questions or comments from the board? Okay.
The district leadership team has not met, and neither has health and wellness. We do have a SASID report. Dr. Russell.
---
**[Dr. Russell — SASID Report]**
The biggest thing we're working on with SASID right now centers on SASID's facilities. Short-term, we're figuring out all the leases for classroom spaces. As you know, District 58 will house more SASID classrooms, and we're going over all of those with the executive director — not only here in District 58 but for all member districts in SASID.
Long-term, SASID's facility and finance committees are working on some options for the co-op, particularly regarding their district office and transition program. The current space on Ogden Avenue in Lisle is not really conducive to either the transition program or the office in general. They are looking at different options for purchasing a building that can house their administrative center as well as the transition program.
One of the things I love to hear as a superintendent — and I'm sure the board will too — is that we are only looking at cost-neutral options, meaning that member districts will not have to incur any debt as a result of what SASID is trying to do in terms of the long-term facility plan. We're looking at spreading the debt out over several years, as we do in local school districts, so that SASID can be the one to issue any debt certificates and local districts would not have to absorb that. More to come on that, but we are getting closer. I do serve on the finance committee for SASID, so I'm paying particularly close attention to how this might impact member districts while still ensuring that we have a great facility for not only our transition program but for the administrative offices as well.
---
**[BOARD MEMBER]**
Questions or comments? I just want to say that the overall cost has been a concern of ours — obviously we're dealing with some financial challenges in general — so I'm glad to hear that —
**Dr. Russell (or Mr. Sisle):** Another thing to note here is that we are only looking at cost-neutral options, meaning that member districts will not have to incur any debt as a result of what SASID is trying to do in terms of the long-term facility plan. We're looking at spreading the debt out over several years, like we do in local school districts, to make sure that SASID can be the one who issues any debt certificates and the local districts would not have to absorb that. So, more to come on that, but we are getting closer. I do serve on the finance committee for SASID, so I'm paying particularly close attention to how that might impact member districts while still ensuring that we have a great facility for not only our transition program, but for the administrative offices as well.
**Board Member:** Questions or comments? I just want to say that I think that has been a concern of ours — the overall cost. Obviously, we're dealing with some financial challenges here in general, so I'm glad to hear that that's been a priority in your conversations.
**Board Member:** Yes, certainly the financial challenges of District 58 with proration and categorical payments are not unique to our district. They're shared by many districts in DuPage and all the other collar counties, and that was something that all member districts expressed concern about. We're still working through all of that, but it is looking much better than the original plan that was put forward by SASID that several of us raised concerns about.
**Board Member:** Fantastic.
**Board Member:** Thank you. All right, that wraps up our reports today. We do have a discussion item tonight. It's called "Setting the Stage for Success in Kindergarten." I'd like to welcome Mr. Sisle.
---
**Mr. Sisle:** Good evening, everyone. Thank you. Tonight we're going to do a brief presentation and allow the board to have some discussion and ask some questions around a couple of ideas to further enhance our ability to set our kindergarten classrooms up for success at the start of each school year. These aren't new conversations internally. These are things we've been talking about for many years, as every grade level is unique. But the beginning of kindergarten presents some unique challenges and opportunities as we try to determine how we're going to begin the year for our youngest learners and how we're going to make sure that they are all set up for success in classrooms that are as well balanced and prepared for them as we can possibly create.
Those really are the two things we're going to focus on tonight. We want to make sure we're thinking about how to build that full school community for our kindergarteners and also make sure that we are taking advantage of every possible opportunity to gather the information that will help us make the most informed decisions about class composition. These ideas that you're going to hear presented tonight come out of discussions that have happened for many years, but really rekindled this fall and have been the product of a few meetings with a number of kindergarten teachers and a number of administrators — really good dialogue, really open conversation — and an experience where the group kind of coalesced behind two significant ideas that we're going to talk about tonight.
These aren't things that the board will formally vote upon, which is why it's a discussion item tonight, but we certainly wanted to give the board an opportunity to weigh in because it will have an impact on our incoming kindergarteners next year and potentially in the future. We think ultimately a very positive impact, but we certainly want to discuss that tonight.
Liz is going to join me on the next slide, and we're also happy to welcome a few guests with us tonight. You'll hear from Ally Hedman, kindergarten teacher at Whittier; Elizabeth Zawatsky, kindergarten teacher at Hillcrest; Christy Hopkins, kindergarten teacher at Indian Trail; and Marissa Sanderson, kindergarten teacher at Fairmont. You'll recognize them from their kindergarten-based décor today — 100th Day teachers. You'll also hear from Dr. Lisa Niforatos, the principal at Fairmont. Again, this is a representation of all of the folks that have been part of this conversation. We'll be excited to welcome all of them up, and then at the end I'll wrap things up and hear your discussion and questions.
---
**Liz:** Good evening, board. We wanted to start by sharing some of our current systems with you. We have a lot of really great traditional opportunities for our kindergarten families that give us a strong foundation.
Our kindergarten roundup is held in March. That is for parents and guardians. They come to the school for an evening and get an overview of the daily structure, some building logistics, and information about kindergarten readiness skills that they can work on with their students over the remainder of the school year and over the summer as they get ready for kindergarten.
We also send out surveys. Our Grove Preschool teachers will fill out surveys and have collaborative time with our kindergarten teachers for students who participate in that program, but we know that doesn't reach all of our students. So we do send surveys out to families — oftentimes we ask that the student's preschool teacher fills that out, but we also get information from families in those surveys as well.
We offer Leap Into Kindergarten, which is an optional summer school session for incoming kindergarten students. Historically, we have about 75 students who participate. We strategically group those students so that they are with peers from their elementary school, so that they see some familiar faces when they start kindergarten — but of course that program doesn't reach all students. We work on kindergarten readiness and socialization.
Our PTAs are fantastic. They run summer programs for our families — summer meetups at parks and on school grounds with popsicles and things like that — so that students and families can interact with one another. And then we hold an annual elementary school meet and greet, which historically has been a kindergarten-through-sixth-grade event, and this year would be the first time as a kindergarten-through-fifth-grade event. It's held a few days prior to school and is an opportunity for socialization and supply drop-off prior to the beginning of the school year.
---
**Ally Hedman:** Hi, everybody. I'm Ally Hedman, kindergarten teacher at Whittier. I'm going to talk about the first enhancement idea that we came up with, which would be a separate meet and greet.
Meet and greet right now is so fun because it is this massive reunification for everybody coming back to school from the summer. However, it does tend to get chaotic — revisiting old teachers, full hallways, and things like that. So we really want to try to separate the kindergarteners from that overwhelming experience and make it kindergarten-focused.
We're thinking of potentially moving it a day earlier, somewhat in the evening or after work hours, to try to get as much engagement as possible. This is just an opportunity for the kindergarteners to see their new school. They can go in the classrooms, walk the halls, and have it not be congested and loud and overwhelming. It gives them time to be focused with the teachers — teachers won't be pulled in a hundred different directions — and we can really focus on getting to know those kids for that first meet-and-greet opportunity.
It can also potentially provide an opportunity for the kids to try a story on the rug with the teachers while the parents separate and learn some of those first-day logistics, so they can get some of that covered before the big first day of kindergarten. Again, it's just another opportunity for the kids to get a little bit more comfortable with their teachers before that first day of school.
I'm going to pass it off to Elizabeth.
---
**Elizabeth Zawatsky:** I'm Elizabeth Zawatsky, kindergarten teacher at Hillcrest, and I'm also a parent of an incoming kindergartener in a District 58 school.
Along with providing kindergarteners with their own meet-and-greet experience, we'd also like to adjust what the first few days of school look like in order to build more balanced classes. What makes kindergarten unique is that we are building our classes with students from a very wide range of pre-kindergarten experiences.
The student information we gain right now comes mainly from surveys. It's relevant to those pre-kindergarten settings and not necessarily to our current classroom expectations. We feel that getting real-time information about students would be most beneficial, and that oftentimes within those first few days of school, we as teachers can already see adjustments that would be helpful in student groupings. We recognize that restructuring the beginning of the year would be an adjustment for parents and for students, but we're excited at the thought of creating a strong sense of community and welcoming kids into their home school.
What this could look like — we have used the terms "Camp Kindergarten" or "Team Kindergarten" in our discussions to reflect that students would be assigned a team at the beginning of the year rather than a classroom teacher for the first two days. Like camp, student groupings would change throughout the day depending on the activity. Students could wear a lanyard with their team color to indicate their core group, but with additional markings to show other groups they'd be a part of throughout the day. The benefits of this would be that students get to meet and interact with all of their kindergarten peers, and adults would be able to observe and interact with all students as well to gain as much information as possible about how to create those balanced classes.
---
**Christy Hopkins:** Hi, I'm Christy Hopkins, kindergarten teacher at Indian Trail. During the first couple of days of kindergarten, our primary focus is really teaching our new kindergarteners how to be a student within the school community. We want to focus on routines and relationships, building learner behaviors that help our students feel safe and confident and ready to learn, rather than conducting more academic or skill-based assessments. This structure is designed to create a predictable and welcoming start to the school year for our kindergarteners, and by focusing on those relationships and routines, we can really help students build confidence and feel secure in this new environment.
After those first two days of Camp Kindergarten, families would receive communication sharing their child's classroom teacher assignment for the remainder of the year. This allows us time to use the information and experiences from those two days to support balancing classroom communities. Beginning on that third day, students would join their assigned classroom teacher and begin building their classroom community. This is where individual classroom routines, relationships, and learning expectations would all be established and would hopefully support a strong and successful school year.
Both Marissa Sanderson and I are going to highlight some things from our prior Camp Kindergarten experience, which was back in 2019.
What I would tell you is that successfully initiating that process really did involve a lot of strong collaboration at the building level. Just like with anything new, communication was really key, and it took on a couple of different forms to make sure that parents and all of our families were getting the information they needed. This included an initial introduction letter about what Camp Kindergarten would look like, what they could expect, what their child could expect, and really the "why" behind the process — making sure that was very clearly communicated with some time between the different communications.
The other important thing that came out of that experience was ensuring that our families had points of contact during those first two days. We get a lot of contact from incoming kindergarten families, and while they didn't have that one point of contact with their classroom teacher, they did know who to contact, and communications back and forth were very fluid and included both teachers.
Our school team built a system where we were truly all hands on deck for that unique experience those first two days — kindergarten teachers, specialists, and the student support team — and that added to the success of the program. At Fairmont, and similarly at Whittier, we fielded really only about one or two additional phone calls from parents with logistical questions. They weren't concerns by any means, just a couple of questions about the process, which we were obviously happy to address. It wasn't a flood of calls, and that really speaks to the importance of proactive communication being in place prior to starting anything new.
From a global or building level, Camp Kindergarten was centered around kids rather than the class for those first two days, and it really provided students with an opportunity to learn about the school as a collective unit. It was a fun and supportive way to start the school year.
---
**Marissa Sanderson:** Hi there. There are some benefits I'd like to highlight from my experience with Camp Kindergarten in 2019.
First was a comprehensive knowledge of all of the students who came in. It really allowed both kindergarten teachers to develop a shared understanding of all the children in the grade level, not just the students assigned to your classroom. This included really important information such as medical needs and allergies, learning styles, social-emotional needs, and family dynamics. At the same time, the opposite was also true — students got to become familiar with both teachers and both classroom environments, giving them a great knowledge of both classes. After placements were finalized, students already felt a sense of familiarity and safety across the kindergarten wing, which helped reduce some of the anxiety of coming into kindergarten at the beginning of the school year.
Second, there was a stronger kindergarten community feel. It truly fostered a grade-level approach rather than a "my class versus your class" model. We were able to get more eyes on students and see if there were additional needs quickly. We also had extra staff in the classrooms — reading specialists, OT, and speech pathologists were able to push in early, observe students in their setting, and begin supporting right away. This collaborative approach emphasized that kindergarten is a shared responsibility and helped build a cohesive, supportive learning community for students from that very first day.
Third was increased flexibility and stronger instructional collaboration. Because both teachers were able to work with all of the students, instructional grouping felt more natural and fluid. While collaborative grouping can happen regardless, Camp Kindergarten made it more effective because students had already been formally introduced to both teachers, both classrooms, and the shared routines. It created a stronger sense of teamwork and made instructional decision-making more informed and intentional.
I also want to provide some context about kindergarten placement and articulation. In most grade levels, teachers spend a great deal of time at the end of the school year articulating with the following grade level's teachers — sharing detailed information about students' growth, their needs, and strategies that may have been helpful. This process allows the next teacher to get a valuable head start and insight into students' needs and successes. In kindergarten, we simply do not have that opportunity. While a small number of kids may come from Grove Preschool, the majority of students coming into our classrooms are brand new to us. We've tried to bridge that gap through parent surveys and outreach to preschools, but participation varies. As a result, kindergarten teachers often begin the year with very limited or no information on any of the children walking into the classroom.
Camp Kindergarten helped to create a form of articulation where one simply does not naturally exist. Even in a short time frame, it allowed teachers to collaborate, observe students, and begin discussing support strategies and skill development before students were permanently placed into a classroom. This early insight helped us make more informed decisions and allowed students to begin their kindergarten experience on a stronger footing.
I also want to acknowledge that Camp Kindergarten did require additional planning on the front end. My teaching partner and I at the time had met over the summer to coordinate logistics and prepare intentionally. However, we felt that that upfront investment resulted in a smoother, more natural flow once the school year began, and it ultimately increased our ability to be more proactive and less reactive as the year continued.
It really has been a topic of heavy discussion within our grade level, and my colleagues have continued to advocate for some form of Camp Kindergarten and have continually brought the idea up during grade level meetings. There seems to be a strong willingness to invest that time early if it means providing a more seamless, supportive transition for our youngest learners.
---
**Mr. Sisle:** So from here, you've heard the shell of some of the logistics. There's obviously a lot more to build out, but we wanted to make sure that we are all in alignment conceptually with moving forward so that we can begin to build out further details.
You heard about the importance of communication that would begin at our kindergarten roundups, which will begin to occur next month, and that really is our target to launch these ideas. We've been in communication with the entire kindergarten team, but we really want to take some collaborative opportunities to make sure that everyone is a part of this, which helps ensure consistency of experiences across the district. Some of that pre-planning work that Marissa was just talking about can be done now; some of it obviously we can't do until we have the list of kids and all of that information.
Our goal and our recommendation would be to implement both of these enhancements beginning this fall, with the recognition that — just as we do with all new things — there will need to be time to reflect upon the experience, to gain feedback from families that have gone through it, and to really see whether this is yielding the benefits we hope it will.
One thing that is important to re-emphasize is that when we did do this in two buildings, there really wasn't the hesitation in the parent community that we might have been concerned about. We had a couple of questions, but there was not a strong parental or familial concern that came out, and it ended up being a very positive experience that people still remember and occasionally talk about. So that would be our plan going forward.
At this point I want to open it up to board questions or any discussion you'd like to have around these ideas.
---
**Board Member:** Thank you. I'll open the floor. Does anybody want to start with a question?
**Board Member:** The only question I had — I think it makes sense, and it's exciting, not only for the teachers. I've got a little one who'll be coming into kindergarten shortly, so I think it makes a lot of sense and it would be exciting to know that this will help inform the decisions about their classroom placement. My only question was: was two days determined to be enough? It sounds like you have experience with the two days and have deemed it sufficient, but I just wanted to gut-check whether a longer period was considered.
**Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question, and we actually did have a slightly longer experience at Whittier during one of those two years where they went all the way to five days. The feedback we got was that that might have been a little long — we were ready to move forward after two or three. Looking at next year's calendar, with the way Thursday, Friday, and then Monday align as a natural break after the weekend, that's why we're looking at a two-day model for next year. The consensus from the limited number of people who had experienced it was that two or three days felt right-sized.
**Board Member:** Thank you.
**Board Member:** I had a similar concern, especially around families finding out their classroom assignment on a Friday. It seems like a lot to put on our kindergarten teachers — to get through those two days and then put the placement information in writing, and have families receive it on a Friday when they don't really have a point of contact for the whole weekend. I would just suggest giving a little more thought to whether that Monday could help with the transition.
**Mr. Sisle:** We've had some of those conversations, and I appreciate that perspective. That's one of the things we'll be finalizing in our next steps.
**Board Member:** Would all of our schools be having this? Are there schools that would only have one section of kindergarten where they would still have Camp Kindergarten, but the students would already know who their teacher was?
**Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question. This year we don't have any schools with a single section of kindergarten, but we don't know that will always be the case, so you're right — there could be some uniqueness there. The one other spot that will be unique is the LCRA dual language program, where there is only one dual language kindergarten teacher. We have talked about how to incorporate some of those Camp Kindergarten experiences for all of the students, even though some will know where they're ultimately going to land prior to that. If we were in a one-section situation, we would look at how to incorporate similar experiences, knowing that in the end there is only one kindergarten classroom.
**Board Member:** That actually makes me think about the dual language program in terms of special program kindergarteners — BEST RISE and DLP. I'm assuming those students would also be invited to attend with the regular education kindergarten teachers, but would those special program teachers also be there? How would that look for kids who might not be full time in the regular education kindergarten?
**Mr. Sisle:** That's a great question, and yes — we want to work to balance those experiences, but we also want to be cognizant of the level of inclusion that's planned for those kindergarten students and make sure that we are setting them up for success in the best way we can. Certainly we would want to join those experiences where possible, but we also need to consider the establishment of routines that some of those students will particularly benefit from based on—
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** At the end there is one kindergarten classroom.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** You just made me think of, when you brought up the dual language in terms of special program kindergarteners — Best Rise, DLP — I'm assuming those students would also be invited to attend with the regular education kindergarten teachers, but would those special programs teachers also be there? Like, how would that look for those kids who might not be full time in the regular ed kindergarten?
**[Dr. Harris]:** That's a great question, and obviously yes, we want to work to balance some of those experiences, but we also want to be cognizant of the level of inclusion that's planned for those kindergarten students in those programs and make sure that we are setting them up for success in the best way that we can. I think yes, certainly we would want to join those experiences where possible, but also the establishment of some of the routines that some of those students will benefit from, based on their individual plans, may lead us to some different ways of thinking about that as we get to the final preparations. Again, that'll be sort of where, as we're getting into the true lists of students, we'll be making some of those determinations.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** The other programs that were mentioned — the traditional programs such as the kindergarten roundup and the Leap into Kindergarten — would those still be in place and not affected at all by this change?
**[Dr. Harris]:** Absolutely. The roundup is primarily a family information night that would continue and be where we'd communicate some of these things. The Leap into Kindergarten program is planned as part of our summer experience. What's important to recognize in all of those things is that it is very challenging, if not impossible, to reach all students across those events — you may actually touch all the students, but what we're trying to accomplish is those moments where, at the beginning of the year, meet and greet is definitely most if not all, but then those first two days are truly all. And I think that's the difference, and that was really a big part of our conversation with the working group — that whatever we do, we really want to make sure that it is touching all of the students who are coming to us at the beginning of the year.
**[Unidentified Staff Member]:** One of the big events that we know is attended very well is kindergarten roundup. And that's why we wanted to have this conversation tonight before we move forward, because as Lisa shared, communication is just so important with this one, especially if families have a child entering kindergarten but they might have an older sibling. If you don't get that class notification in kindergarten, we want to make sure that families know about any potential changes, especially at the roundup. And of course we'll communicate it a hundred different ways, but we wanted to make sure that we have that conversation at the roundup so parents know that over the summer they wouldn't be getting a kindergarten class list, even though their other children may.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Do those roundups typically happen during the school day or after school?
**[Unidentified Staff Member]:** They're all in the evening at school.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** All in the evening. And do we provide a virtual option for families or a recording?
**[Unidentified Staff Member]:** We don't — the information that is presented is available, but we don't do it virtually live or anything like that, and I don't believe we have a recording at this point. During COVID we did that, but we have not continued that. Now it is more of a live event, but all of the information is sort of the launch of a lot of content, and then it's all very easily discoverable and pushed out in several different ways as we go through.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Perhaps just an option, if we are going to go with Camp Kindergarten, of having some sort of video versus a handout of what it should look like. I think the team did a great job of making it very student-centered and that it really is going to be meeting the needs of students and where they're at by matching them with a classroom that's going to help them grow. But I think it's translating that so families can understand how student-centered it really is. And it seems like there's a good amount of collaboration happening in these kindergarten classrooms anyway, because then it becomes less of a "who did they get" — they're getting the same experience across all 58 classrooms, and they see that partnership from the beginning as such a powerful instructional tool.
**[Unidentified Staff Member]:** Absolutely.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Other questions or comments?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Quick question, because we had done this in some spots previously. Just knowing some of the history here in Downers Grove — how have families and students handled the fact that now they've got a taste of the school and they might start to get an opinion on "I want to be in this class" or "I made a friend and I want to be with that friend"? How is that handled when it happens after they've started the experience, where people might start to form stronger opinions, as opposed to getting that notification, talking with your student in advance, and coming into the room with momentum? There's sort of a routine that families have of "we're going to check and this is who you have and we're going to introduce that person" and there's a sense of "I've got my momentum, I'm going to start to build a relationship." How did that go in the two years at one location and the one year at the other location?
**[Dr. Harris]:** We did not experience any of that, because again, those are things we'd all kind of anticipated — what happens when you get that comment or question or concern on day three or four? And we truly didn't have that experience. I can't tell you it will never happen, but it was not part of that experience. As we reflected on why that might be, there was definitely a lot of conversation about the deliberate efforts to make sure that everything was balanced during Camp Kindergarten — so no one group spent more time with Teacher A than Teacher B, and the groupings were moving around during the day so the kids were interacting with multiple other students instead of being in a consistent core group. I think it was that deliberate exposure to everything in a really balanced format that helped make sure those relationships were growing across the board, and we kind of minimized the risk of a child feeling "I am spending more time with Teacher A and therefore I'm going to feel a certain way if I end up in Teacher B's classroom." A lot of deliberate planning went into making sure that was balanced. But honestly, we did not experience that concern coming out of the initial experiences.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Perfect.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Looks like you have a question.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** No.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Okay. All right. Well, thank you.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Appreciate it.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Thank you to our kindergarten team.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Yeah, thank you all for being here tonight.
---
**[Board President Hughes]:** All right. Public comment time. This is an opportunity for members of the audience to share public comment with the board, but is not intended to be a time for members of the public to enter into a dialogue with the board. Issues raised during public comment may be addressed by administrative staff as appropriate or added to future agenda items. The board has allowed 30 minutes for public comment this evening. We ask you to keep it to a three-minute limit to give everyone an opportunity to speak. Do we have anything in the basket? We do not have anything in the basket. Is there anyone here wishing to make public comment? If so, please step up to the mic and state your name and attendance area or your place of employment.
All right, then we'll move on. Next up is going to be the approval of minutes. Are there suggested revisions to the minutes as presented in the packet of materials?
All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the minutes from the January 12th, 2026 regular meeting as presented?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** All those in favor?
**[Board Members]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Any opposed? The motion carried to approve the minutes of the January 12th, 2026 regular meeting as presented. Is there a motion to approve the minutes of the January 26th, 2026 financial workshop as presented?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Motion.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** All those in favor?
**[Board Members]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Any opposed? The motion carried to approve the minutes of the January 26th, 2026 financial workshop as presented.
We have a consent agenda tonight. Are there any items a board member would like to have considered separately? All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the consent agenda consisting of the personnel report and the financial statements consisting of the list of bills and summary?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** All right. Thank you. Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The consent agenda has been approved as presented in the packet of materials.
As part of this consent agenda, the board has hired a new principal for Whittier School. I'd like to hand it over to you, Dr. Russell, to introduce him.
---
**[Dr. Russell]:** Thank you very much. This is always one of the most exciting things I get to do as superintendent. I want to thank so many of the Whittier staff members who are here tonight to welcome our new principal.
As you know, Whittier principal Michael Krugman will retire at the end of this school year after 15 years of dedicated service to our school district and Whittier in particular. We will miss his leadership and will also just miss his presence and everything he does for Whittier. We certainly wish Michael and his family the very best in a well-deserved retirement.
Because this was a planned retirement, we began the principal selection process early, which ensured a strong pool of candidates and will allow for a smooth transition. This process included multiple interviews with administrators and staff, as well as input from Whittier staff, support personnel, families, and even a student council focus group — that was a lot of fun during the process.
From this collective feedback, Mr. Brian Bolton emerged as the strongest candidate, and we were pleased to recommend him for appointment as principal of Whittier School in the personnel agenda.
Brian brings more than 13 years of experience in education. He currently serves as the principal of Fullerton Elementary School in Addison School District 4. He has also served as an assistant principal in both Itasca and Lyons school districts and as a middle school social studies teacher. He began his career right here in District 58 as a student teacher at Herrick Middle School. Mr. Bolton holds a master's degree in educational leadership from NIU and a bachelor's degree in secondary education from Lewis University.
Brian also has strong ties to our community. He attended Indian Trail Elementary and O'Neill Middle School, graduated from Downers Grove South High School, and currently lives in Downers Grove with his wife and children, who joined us this evening — nice to see you kids.
He is eager to give back to the community that shaped him and to get to know our students, families, and staff in the greater Whittier School community. Please join me in welcoming Mr. Brian Bolton to Whittier School and as our new principal.
---
**[Mr. Bolton]:** Well, thank you, Board of Education and District 58 community. This is a bit of a surreal moment for me to be back here after all these years, in a district that gave me so much. My daughters are going to be going through Kingsley, so it's really exciting to be able to contribute to the Downers Grove community in this way. I'm really looking forward to working with Mr. Krugman, the Whittier community, and the Whittier teachers and staff who are here today, and to really hit the ground running to ensure a smooth transition, build on some traditions, and transition into the future. Again, my sincerest gratitude — thank you for giving me this opportunity, and I won't let you down. Thank you.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Thank you. Congratulations.
---
All right, we have a couple of items up for action tonight. First up is the 2026–2027 school fees. Is there a motion to approve the school fees for the 2026–27 school year as presented?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Any discussion? All right. Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried to approve the school fees for the 2026–27 school year as presented.
Next up, we have a resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force. Is there a motion to adopt the resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried to adopt the resolution for the dismissal of a custodial maintenance employee for reasons other than reduction in force.
I have a construction consent agenda tonight. Are there any items a board member would like to have considered separately? All right. If not, is there a motion to approve the construction consent agenda consisting of the elementary school kitchen equipment purchase?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Motion.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Thank you. Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The construction consent agenda has been approved as presented in the packet of materials.
I have a couple of announcements. Friday, February 20th at 7:00 a.m. will be our legislative breakfast, and then Monday, February 23rd at 7:00 p.m. will be the curriculum workshop, right back here at the Downers Grove Civic Center.
The board will now meet in closed session. Is there a motion to move to closed session to discuss the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of a specific employee of the district — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) — and the collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(2) — and for the discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under the Open Meetings Act, whether for the purpose of approval of those minutes by the body or the semiannual review of the minutes as mandated by Section 2.06 — that's 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(21)?
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** So moved.
**[Unidentified Board Member]:** Second.
**[Board President Hughes]:** Any discussion on that? All right. Melissa, please call roll.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Doshi.
**[Doshi]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hanus.
**[Hanus]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Olczyk.
**[Olczyk]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Thomas.
**[Thomas]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Bernard.
**[Bernard]:** Aye.
**[Secretary Jerves]:** Member Hughes.
**[Hughes]:** Aye.
**[Board President Hughes]:** The motion carried. The board will now move into closed session after a short recess. It's 8:24 — let's try to be in there in four minutes, at 8:28.
Cleaned version uses AI to add punctuation, paragraphs, and speaker labels. Switch to "Original" for the unmodified auto-caption.